Reading HUBB? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track HUBB free→Reading HUBB? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track HUBB free→
NYSEIndustrialsElectrical Equipment & PartsSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral. Earnings quality is mixed. Management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent changes. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Compared with sector peers, HUBB is typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 7% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair. The three-year read shows peer multiples imply a price about 22% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis). If HUBB cuts guidance on the next call, that’s a meaningful negative. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $476.89. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $477 HUBB trades at 25× p/e, in line with its 24× p/e peer median. Our $449 fair value reflects that, medium confidence. Analysts: $503–$600. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 6% near-term growth, in line with our forecast of about 8%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 0 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 64% for the rest of the cohort, n=4882).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.19x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=4440).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $5.42 → $5.35 (-1.2% / 30d). 3 raised, 6 cut, 12 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 50% of analysts rate Buy.
1 positive, 2 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$108.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$295.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,736.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: This would signal a slowdown in momentum, raising concerns about future growth.
Confirms:Q2 organic sales growth was less than 6%.
Disproves:Q2 organic sales growth was more than 9%.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for HUBB yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On June 2, 2026, Hubbell Incorporated (“Hubbell”) entered into an underwriting agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”) with J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, BofA Securities, Inc. and HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., as representatives of the several underwriters named in Schedule I thereto (collectively, the “Underwriters”), relating to Hubbell’s public offering of $500,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its 4.650% Senior Notes due 2031 (the “2031 Notes”)…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$503.00 – $600.00 (median $565.00) · 3 analysts · as of 2026-05-04
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
HUBB Hubbell Incorporated | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 56 of 100 | full | moderate |
PH Parker Hannifin | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 76 of 100 | full | moderate |
ITW Illinois Tool Works | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 92 of 100 | fair | moderate |
GWW W. W. Grainger | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 73 of 100 | full | moderate |
DOV Dover Corporation | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 66 of 100 | fair | low |
5 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Industrials names rated volatile grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 59% for the rest of the cohort, n=840).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLI
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Hubbell aims for total sales growth of 8-11% in 2026, including organic growth of 6-9%.
Hubbell has raised its EPS guidance for 2026 to a range of $17.45-$18.00.
Hubbell is focusing on adjusted EPS growth, with a target range of $19.30-$19.85 for 2026.
Why it matters: Raising EPS guidance signals confidence in future earnings. This could improve investor sentiment.
Confirms:Management raises EPS guidance for 2026 during the Q2 earnings call.
Disproves:Management maintains or lowers EPS guidance for 2026.
Why it matters: This guidance shows strong performance and trust from investors.
Confirms:Adjusted EPS guidance for 2026 remains above $19.30.
Disproves:Adjusted EPS guidance for 2026 drops below $19.30.
Why it matters: A drop in operating margin may mean higher costs or problems.
Confirms:Operating margin was less than 17%.
Disproves:Operating margin was more than 18%.
Why it matters: Achieving this growth is key to meeting the 2026 sales target. It shows the company's ability to grow despite challenges.
Confirms:Q2 total sales growth reported at 7% or higher.
Disproves:Q2 total sales growth reported below 5%.
Why it matters: Good integration can boost growth and efficiency for Hubbell.
Confirms:The NSI acquisition is now complete.
Disproves:There are delays or problems in the NSI acquisition.
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation Under an Off-balance Sheet Arrangement of the Registrant. The information set forth in
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On May 15, 2026, Hubbell, as borrower, entered into a Term Loan Agreement (the “Term Loan Agreement”) with a syndicate of lenders and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent. The Term Loan Agreement provides Hubbell with the ability to borrow up to $900 million on an unsecured basis to finance the NSI Acquisition, repay certain existing indebtedness of NSI and pay fees, costs and expenses in connection with the foregoing. The availability…
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On May 1, 2026, Hubbell Incorporated, a Connecticut corporation, and Hubbell Incorporated (Delaware), a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Hubbell Incorporated, entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”), by and among Hubbell Incorporated (Delaware), NSI Electrical Buyer, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), NSI Buyer, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“Seller”), and Hubbell Incorporated, as parent guaranto…
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant. The disclosure set forth in