Reading HOG? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track HOG free→Reading HOG? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track HOG free→
NYSEConsumer DiscretionaryRecreational VehiclesSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak, and earnings quality is fragile, reported profits aren't backed by cash. Management's recent track record has been steady, but risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 8% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair, but weakening. Key factors to watch include potential guidance cuts and sector trends, as these could significantly impact HOG's performance. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $25.64. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $26 HOG trades at 14× p/e, below its 16× p/e peer median. Our $28 fair value sits above the price; medium confidence. Analysts: $12–$28. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 9% below a flat-multiple fair value, in line with our forecast of about -7%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated weak grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=2844).
Over the trailing year it converted 0.87x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated fragile grew net income 45% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2427).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.61 → $0.62 (+2.3% / 30d). 2 raised, 5 cut, 14 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 31% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target -38.4% above current price.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$176.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$422.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $4,322.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Better operating income means better cost control. This is important for Harley's finances.
Confirms:Operating income goes up by more than 5% from Q1.
Disproves:Operating income goes down or stays the same from Q1.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Store closure indicates potential revenue decline.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition . On May 5, 2026, Harley-Davidson, Inc. (the “Company”) issued a press release (the “Press Release”) announcing the Company’s first quarter 2026 results for the financial period ended March 31, 2026. A copy of the Press Release is being furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$12.00 – $28.00 (median $25.00) · 5 analysts · as of 2026-05-19
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Consumer Discretionary (broad).
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
HOG Harley-Davidson | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 82 of 100 | fair | elevated |
BURL Burlington Stores | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 98 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
DKS Dick's Sporting Goods | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 36 of 100 | full | moderate |
SN SharkNinja | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 53 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
H Hyatt | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 20 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
1 material management or governance event in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated stable grew net income 55% of the time over the next year (vs 56% for the rest of the cohort, n=483).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLY
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Management aims to enhance operating income through strategic initiatives.
Management is focused on increasing cash flow from operations to support business activities.
Management is committed to driving revenue growth through strategic initiatives.
Why it matters: Harley-Davidson is growing its revenue. This shows it can handle current challenges. This is key for future success.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth exceeds 15% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth remains below 10% year over year.
Why it matters: Better cash flow from operations shows financial strength. This is important for Harley's growth plans.
Confirms:Cash flow from operations increases by more than 10% compared to Q1.
Disproves:Cash flow from operations decreases or remains flat compared to Q1.
Why it matters: Consumer spending affects Harley's sales. A strong report may boost confidence in the market.
Confirms one read:Consumer spending goes up after the CPI report.
Confirms the other:Consumer spending goes down after the CPI report.
Why it matters: Stable or rising revenue shows success in growth plans.
Confirms:Revenue growth stabilizes or rises year over year, exceeding $1.33B.
Disproves:Revenue continues to decline year over year.
The filing pertains to the approval of an amendment to the Incentive Plan, not a management change.