Reading GWW? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track GWW free→Reading GWW? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track GWW free→NYSEIndustrialsIndustrial DistributionSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, while earnings quality is neutral and management's recent track record has been steady. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, which may impact future growth. Compared with sector peers, GWW trades above typical levels. Peer multiples imply a price about 21% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $1315.87. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $1,316 the market pays 32× p/e — above the 24× p/e peer median but in line with its own 26× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $1,087 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with medium confidence. Analysts: $1,125–$1,365. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 21% near-term growth, in line with our forecast of about 16%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Industrials names rated strong grew net income 69% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=3696).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.18x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=4440).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $10.97 → $11.22 (+2.3% / 30d). 13 raised, 2 cut, 16 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 24% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 4.1% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$86.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$187.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,470.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Sales growth below this level may show weaker demand in a maturing market.
Confirms:Q2 2026 sales growth reported below 6.7% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 2026 sales growth reported above 6.7% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for GWW yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 7, 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. issued a press release announcing its financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2026. A copy is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this report.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$1125.00 – $1365.00 (median $1318.50) · 6 analysts · as of 2026-05-27
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
GWW W. W. Grainger | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 73 of 100 | full | moderate |
PH Parker Hannifin | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 76 of 100 | full | moderate |
ITW Illinois Tool Works | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 92 of 100 | fair | moderate |
DOV Dover Corporation | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 66 of 100 | fair | low |
IR Ingersoll Rand | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 57 of 100 | fair | moderate |
1 material management or governance event in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Industrials names rated stable grew net income 60% of the time over the next year (vs 59% for the rest of the cohort, n=792).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLI
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Grainger aims to increase its full year 2026 revenue guidance to reflect strong performance.
Grainger is committed to increasing its full year 2026 EPS guidance based on strong performance.
Grainger plans to increase its full year 2026 operating margin guidance due to improved performance.
Why it matters: Raising revenue guidance shows stronger business growth. It can also make investors more confident.
Confirms:Management raises revenue guidance for the full year 2026. This is higher than current estimates.
Disproves:Management maintains or lowers full year 2026 revenue guidance.
Why it matters: Earnings below this level may make investors worried. They might think it is hard to make money in a tough market.
Confirms:Q2 2026 diluted EPS reported below $44.25.
Disproves:Q2 2026 diluted EPS reported above $44.25.
Why it matters: Higher EPS guidance means better profits. It also shows better performance in operations.
Confirms:Management announces higher EPS guidance for full year 2026. This is above current estimates.
Disproves:Management maintains or lowers full year 2026 EPS guidance.
Why it matters: Earnings results will provide insight into revenue and profit trends for the company.
Confirms one read:Earnings report shows revenue growth and EPS above market expectations.
Confirms the other:Earnings report shows revenue decline. EPS is below market expectations.
Why it matters: A rise in margin guidance shows good cost control and strong pricing power.
Confirms:Operating margin guidance raised above 16.0% for full year 2026.
Disproves:Operating margin guidance remains at or below 16.0% for full year 2026.
Why it matters: Interest rate changes can impact Grainger's cost of capital and demand for products.
Confirms one read:FOMC raises interest rates. This shows tighter money policy.
Confirms the other:FOMC keeps interest rates unchanged or lowers them.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On February 3, 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. issued a press release announcing its financial results for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2025. A copy is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this report.