Reading GS? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track GS free→Reading GS? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track GS free→
NYSEFinancialsCapital MarketsSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but earnings quality is fragile, reported profits aren't backed by cash. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, which may impact future growth. Peer multiples imply a price about 4% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair, but weakening. If GS cuts guidance on the next call, that could be a meaningful negative. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $1062.75. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $1,063 GS trades at 19× p/e, in line with its 18× p/e peer median. Our $1,023 fair value reflects that, high confidence. Analysts: $900–$1,066. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 4% near-term growth, below our forecast of about 21%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 3 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated strong grew net income 67% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=3733).
Over the trailing year it converted -2.20x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated fragile grew net income 49% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=3541).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $14.42 → $13.74 (-4.7% / 30d). 7 raised, 8 cut, 19 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 28% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target -13.1% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 1 guided quarters · 0.0% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$125.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$237.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,943.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: This payment shows Goldman Sachs is committed to giving money back to shareholders.
Confirms:The dividend of $4.50 per share is paid as scheduled.
Disproves:The dividend payment is delayed or reduced.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Threatens: Increase Global Banking & Markets revenue
Delayed rate cuts could hinder Global Banking & Markets revenue growth.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
No material events in the last 90 days.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$900.00 – $1066.00 (median $990.00) · 4 analysts · as of 2026-06-12
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Investment Banking & Brokerage.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
GS Goldman Sachs | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 36 of 100 | full | moderate |
MS Morgan Stanley | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 57 of 100 | full | moderate |
SCHW Charles Schwab Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 86 of 100 | fair | moderate |
IBKR Interactive Brokers | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 57 of 100 | full | moderate |
HOOD Robinhood Markets | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 22 of 100 | expensive | high |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on growing revenue in the Global Banking & Markets segment through higher investment banking fees and equities revenue.
Improve performance in Asset & Wealth Management through higher management fees and incentive fees.
Continue returning capital to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases.
Why it matters: This revenue growth shows if Goldman Sachs is maintaining its strong performance in this key area.
Confirms:Q2 Global Banking & Markets revenue growth above 15% year over year.
Disproves:Global Banking & Markets revenue growth below 10% year over year.
Why it matters: This shows how well Goldman Sachs manages its assets and client relationships.
Confirms one read:Q2 Asset & Wealth Management revenue growth above 10% year over year.
Confirms the other:Asset & Wealth Management revenue growth below 5% year over year.
Why it matters: The efficiency ratio affects how much money the firm makes. A lower ratio means better cost control.
Confirms:Efficiency ratio drops to below 60% in Q2.
Disproves:Efficiency ratio worsens to above 65% in Q2.
Focus on M&A aligns with growth objectives.
Positive outlook supports revenue growth expectations.
Threatens: Increase Global Banking & Markets revenue
Lower oil price estimates may impact revenue.
Fed rate cut expectations can enhance revenue growth.
Advances: Increase Global Banking & Markets revenue
Strengthens revenue outlook in Global Banking & Markets.
Departure of key banker may impact strategic direction.