Reading FTV? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track FTV free→Reading FTV? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track FTV free→NYSEIndustrialsScientific & Technical InstrumentsSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes. Earnings quality is robust, and risk is moderate, while the sector backdrop presents a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 3% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair, quality intact. If FTV cuts guidance on the next call, that's a meaningful negative. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $60.14. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $60 FTV trades at 26× p/e, in line with its 24× p/e peer median. Our $58 fair value reflects that, high confidence. Analysts: $56–$68. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 3% near-term growth, in line with our forecast of about 0%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
No fragility gates fired.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Industrials names rated strong grew net income 69% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=3696).
Over the trailing year it converted 2.16x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Industrials names rated robust grew net income 64% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=3333).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.70 → $0.71 (+0.2% / 30d). 5 raised, 0 cut, 14 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 24% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target -2.6% above current price.
1 positive, 1 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
Transition story with positive analyst positioning (often a turnaround setup).
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$94.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$254.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,373.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Maintaining EPS guidance of $2.90 to $3.00 is key for investor confidence.
Confirms one read:Management says EPS guidance is still between $2.90 and $3.00 during the call.
Confirms the other:Management lowers EPS guidance to below $2.90 during the earnings call.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for FTV yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On May 14, 2026, Fortive Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), completed an underwritten offering (the “Offering”) of $600 million aggregate principal amount of its 4.750% Notes due 2031 (the “2031 notes”) and $500 million aggregate principal amount of its 5.250% Notes due 2036 (the “2036 notes” and, together with the 2031 notes, the “notes”). The Company intends to use the net proceeds of the Offering to refinance certain indebtednes…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$56.00 – $68.00 (median $60.00) · 4 analysts · as of 2026-06-03
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
FTV Fortive | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 72 of 100 | full | moderate |
PH Parker Hannifin | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 76 of 100 | full | moderate |
ITW Illinois Tool Works | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 92 of 100 | fair | moderate |
GWW W. W. Grainger | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 73 of 100 | full | moderate |
DOV Dover Corporation | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 66 of 100 | fair | low |
9 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Industrials names rated volatile grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 59% for the rest of the cohort, n=840).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLI
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Met or beat guidance 88% of the last 8 guided quarters · 52.3% avg surprise
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Fortive aims to maintain its EPS guidance range of $2.90 to $3.00 for the fiscal year 2026.
Fortive is committed to maintaining stability in its operating income.
Fortive aims to enhance its cash flow from operations to support its financial stability.
Why it matters: Updates on share buybacks show focus on capital use and returns.
Confirms:Management says they completed an extra $500 million in share buybacks.
Disproves:No further share buybacks announced or completed in the next quarter.
Why it matters: Revenue growth shows strong demand and good performance.
Confirms one read:Q2 revenue growth exceeds 5.3% year-over-year.
Confirms the other:Q2 revenue growth falls below 5.3% year-over-year.
Why it matters: Stable operating income helps long-term growth. It also builds trust with investors.
Confirms one read:Operating income is steady or higher than last quarter.
Confirms the other:Operating income drops a lot compared to the previous quarter.
Why it matters: Improving cash flow is crucial for funding growth and supporting buybacks.
Confirms:Cash from operations increases by more than 10% year over year in Q2.
Disproves:Cash from operations declines or stays flat year over year in Q2.
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant. The information set forth in
of this Current Report on Form 8-K and the press release attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement On March 17, 2026 (the “ Closing Date ”), Fortive Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “ Company ”), entered into a third amended and restated credit agreement (the “ Credit Agreement ”) with Bank of America, N.A. (“ Bank of America ”), as administrative agent and a swing line lender, and a syndicate of lenders from time to time party thereto, that provides for a 5-year revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $2.0…
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant. The information set forth under