Reading FTRE? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track FTRE free→Reading FTRE? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track FTRE free→
NASDAQHealth CareBiotechnologySnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality cannot be assessed since the company was unprofitable over the past year. Risk is high, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, with FTRE trading below typical levels compared to sector peers. Peer multiples imply a price roughly in line with where it trades (about fair); the read is fair, but weakening. The outlook hinges on whether FTRE cuts guidance on the next call, which could negatively impact estimates and the stock's performance. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 5 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $16.48. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $16 the market pays 29× p/e — above the 16× p/e peer median but in line with its own 29× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $16 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with medium confidence. Analysts: $11–$20. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 2% of near-term growth above a flat-multiple fair value; not enough history to forecast a comparison. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Health Care names rated neutral grew net income 50% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=3115).
Over the trailing year it converted -0.49x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
Not enough signal yet.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.17 → $0.18 (+1.8% / 30d). 3 raised, 3 cut, 10 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 42% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$238.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$791.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $5,179.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Improving operating income shows Fortrea is managing costs well. It supports long-term growth.
Confirms:Operating income for Q2 is better than Q1.
Disproves:Operating income for Q2 is lower than Q1.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for FTRE yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 5, 2026 , Fortrea Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) issued a press release, announcing the Company's financial results for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2026. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report and is incorporated herein by reference. Pursuant to General Instruction B.2 of Current Report on Form 8-K, the information contained in, or incorporated into, Item 2.02, including the press release atta…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$11.00 – $20.00 (median $16.00) · 5 analysts · as of 2026-05-07
Looks more expensive than peers.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Biotechnology.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
FTRE Fortrea | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 21 of 100 | full | high |
ABBV AbbVie | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 79 of 100 | full | low |
AMGN Amgen | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 75 of 100 | full | moderate |
GILD Gilead Sciences | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 96 of 100 | fair | moderate |
VRTX Vertex Pharmaceuticals | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 82 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLV
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on stabilizing revenue to ensure consistent financial performance.
Improve cash flow from operations to strengthen financial stability.
Focus on improving operating income to enhance profitability.
Why it matters: Improving cash flow is crucial for Fortrea's financial health. It shows operational strength.
Confirms:Cash flow from operations is higher than in Q1.
Disproves:Cash flow from operations declines or remains flat compared to Q1.
Why it matters: Stabilizing revenue is a top priority for Fortrea. A decline could signal deeper issues.
Confirms:Q2 revenue results show no decline or a slight increase compared to Q1.
Disproves:Q2 revenue results decline year over year or worse than Q1.
Why it matters: A drop in sector revenue growth could impact Fortrea's performance. It shows broader challenges.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth drops below its median of 10% year over year.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth remains above its median.