Reading FRT? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track FRT free→Reading FRT? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track FRT free→
NYSEReal EstateReit - RetailSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes. Earnings quality is neutral, and the company has a capital-unfriendly stance. The sector backdrop is a headwind, yet FRT is performing above typical compared to sector peers. Peer multiples imply a price about 11% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair. The analysis is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $125.84. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $126 FRT trades at 22× p/e, in line with its 18× p/e peer median. Our $117 fair value reflects that, high confidence. Analysts: $107–$135. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 8% near-term growth, in line with our forecast of about 9%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Real Estate names rated strong grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=1506).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.50x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Real Estate names rated neutral grew net income 61% of the time over the next year (vs 47% for the rest of the cohort, n=1866).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.73 → $0.71 (-1.8% / 30d). 0 raised, 2 cut, 5 covering analysts.
1 upgrade, 0 downgrades / 30d, 8 maintained. 65% of analysts rate Buy.
8 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 5.8% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$74.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$154.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $696.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Changes in sector performance can impact FRT's growth and valuation. It reflects broader market trends.
Confirms one read:The real estate sector shows signs of revenue growth above 7%.
Confirms the other:Sector revenue growth keeps slowing or stays below 7%.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for FRT yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
and the exhibits attached hereto shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or under the Exchange Act, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. On May 1, 2026, Federal Realty Investment Trust issued supplemental data pertaining to its operations, as well as a press release, to report its financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. The supplemental data and press release are furnished as Exhibi…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$107.00 – $135.00 (median $120.00) · 13 analysts · as of 2026-06-05
Looks more expensive than peers.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Retail REITs.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
FRT Federal Realty Investment Trust | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 83 of 100 | full | low |
SPG Simon Property Group | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 93 of 100 | fair | low |
O Realty Income | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 27 of 100 | fair | low |
KIM Kimco Realty | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 46 of 100 | full | low |
REG Regency Centers | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 64 of 100 | expensive | low |
3 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Real Estate names rated volatile grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=3774).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLRE
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Federal Realty aims to raise and tighten its 2026 earnings per diluted share, Nareit FFO, and Core FFO guidance.
Federal Realty is focused on managing its capital allocation obligations effectively.
Federal Realty is addressing the earnings miss to improve financial performance.
Why it matters: Updates on capital use show how the company handles its money. This affects growth plans.
Confirms one read:Management will share a new investment plan. This will happen after the credit agreement.
Confirms the other:Management reports more delays or problems in capital use plans.
Why it matters: An update on earnings guidance will show how management views future growth. It can impact investor confidence.
Confirms:Management raises 2026 earnings guidance during the Q2 call.
Disproves:Management lowers or keeps 2026 earnings guidance the same. There is no improvement.
Why it matters: Fixing the earnings miss is key to rebuilding investor trust.
Confirms:Earnings show a big improvement in the next quarter compared to the last.
Disproves:Earnings continue to decline or remain flat after the miss.
Why it matters: Raising guidance shows that management believes in future earnings. This could help investors feel better.
Confirms:Management shares a new earnings guidance range. This range is higher than before.
Disproves:Management keeps or lowers the earnings guidance for 2026.
Entry into Material Definitive Agreement. Amendments to Credit Agreement and Term Loan Agreements Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement On April 14, 2026, Federal Realty OP LP (the “Partnership”) entered into a Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “New Credit Agreement”), by and among the Partnership, as Borrower, the financial institutions party thereto and their permitted assignees, as Lenders, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, and the other…
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant. The disclosure required by this
Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement. The disclosure required by this