Reading FDS? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track FDS free→Reading FDS? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track FDS free→
NYSEFinancialsFinancial Data & Stock ExchangesSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is also neutral. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, which may impact the company's prospects. Compared with sector peers, FDS trades above typical levels. Peer multiples imply a price about 5% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $241.16. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $241 FDS trades at 14× p/e, below its 15× p/e peer median. Our $254 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 5% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 14%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=4936).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.36x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=4725).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
Not enough signal yet.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $4.32 → $4.32 (-0.0% / 30d). 0 raised, 1 cut, 16 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 16% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 3.9% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$169.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$529.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $5,750.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: This revenue range shows FactSet can grow even with cost pressures. Hitting this target means strong client retention and new clients.
Confirms:Q3 GAAP revenues reported at or above $2,450 million.
Disproves:Q3 GAAP revenues were below $2,450 million.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for FDS yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
No material events in the last 90 days.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Financial Exchanges & Data.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
FDS FactSet | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 93 of 100 | fair | elevated |
SPGI S&P Global | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 69 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
CME CME Group | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 42 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
ICE Intercontinental Exchange | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 48 of 100 | full | moderate |
MCO Moody's Corporation | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 53 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on growing Organic ASV by $130 million to $160 million during fiscal 2026.
Aim to achieve GAAP revenues in the range of $2,450 million to $2,470 million for fiscal 2026.
Maintain adjusted operating margin in the range of 34.0% to 35.5% for fiscal 2026.
Why it matters: This growth range shows if FactSet can expand its subscription revenue. Meeting this target signals strong demand for its services.
Confirms:Organic ASV growth reported at or above $130 million for FY 2026.
Disproves:Organic ASV growth reported below $130 million for FY 2026.
Why it matters: This margin range shows how well FactSet controls costs while growing. It affects overall profitability.
Confirms:Operating margin was between 34.0% and 35.5% for Q3 2026.
Disproves:Operating margin was below 34.0% for Q3 2026.
Why it matters: If revenue hits the top of guidance, it shows strong business and market demand.
Confirms:GAAP revenues reported at $2,470 million for FY 2026.
Disproves:GAAP revenues reported below $2,450 million for FY 2026.
Why it matters: Better margins mean lower costs and better efficiency. This can lead to higher profits.
Confirms:Operating margin reported at 35.5% or higher for FY 2026.
Disproves:Operating margin was below 34.0% for FY 2026.
Why it matters: Increasing client count shows FactSet's ability to attract new business. It signals strong market demand for its services.
Confirms:Client count reported at or above 9,200 by the next earnings call.
Disproves:Client count reported below 9,200 by the next earnings call.