Reading FCX? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track FCX free→Reading FCX? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track FCX free→NYSEMaterialsCopperSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is mixed. Management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes, and the capital stance is capital unfriendly. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, which may affect performance compared to sector peers, where it is typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 36% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $68.41. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $68 the market pays 33× p/e — above the 25× p/e peer median but in line with its own 27× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $55 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with medium confidence. Analysts: $58–$77. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 23% near-term growth, ahead of our forecast of about 12%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack. Regime (Crisis) does not concentrate fragility.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Materials names rated neutral grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=1462).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.27x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Materials names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=1297).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.00 → $0.57. 2 raised, 7 cut, 13 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 2 maintained. 83% of analysts rate Buy.
3 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 12.5% above current price.
0 positive, 2 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 1 guided quarters · 200.0% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$236.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$475.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,489.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Hitting or beating this sales target shows recovery from delays at Grasberg. It shows strong operations.
Confirms:Q2 copper sales reported at or above 690 million pounds.
Disproves:Q2 copper sales reported below 690 million pounds.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for FCX yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On May 14, 2026, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) and PT Freeport Indonesia (PTFI), a subsidiary of FCX, as borrowers, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, Bank of America, N.A., as syndication agent, and each of the lenders and issuing banks party thereto entered into a new revolving credit agreement (the New Revolving Credit Facility). The New Revolving Credit Facility replaced FCX’s prior $3.0 billion senior unsecured revolving credit f…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$58.50 – $77.00 (median $72.00) · 11 analysts · as of 2026-06-10
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Materials (broad).
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
FCX Freeport-McMoRan | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 51 of 100 | full | elevated |
LIN Linde plc | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 67 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
NEM Newmont | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 94 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
SHW Sherwin-Williams | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 71 of 100 | full | moderate |
ECL Ecolab | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 85 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
4 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Materials names rated volatile grew net income 61% of the time over the next year (vs 51% for the rest of the cohort, n=235).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLB
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on increasing copper production to meet growing demand.
Maintain disciplined capital expenditure management to support strategic projects.
Continue efforts to optimize cash costs to improve profitability.
Why it matters: Managing capital spending is crucial for financial health. High spending could signal trouble.
Confirms:Capital spending was over $1.5 billion for Q2 2026.
Disproves:Capital spending stays at or below $1.5 billion for Q2 2026.
Why it matters: Keeping or raising net income shows strong finances and good operations.
Confirms:Net income reported above $881 million for Q2.
Disproves:Net income reported below $881 million for Q2.
Why it matters: Managing capital spending is crucial for Freeport's financial health. Clear guidance is needed.
Confirms one read:Management thinks capital spending will be less than $2 billion in 2026.
Confirms the other:Management thinks capital spending will be more than $2.5 billion in 2026.
Why it matters: Saving on cash costs is important for making money. Updates will show how well management is doing.
Confirms:Cash costs decrease by more than 3% compared to Q1 2026.
Disproves:Cash costs increase or remain unchanged compared to Q1 2026.
Why it matters: Lower costs lead to better efficiency. This helps profits, especially with rising input costs.
Confirms:Average unit net cash costs reported below $1.95 per pound for copper.
Disproves:Average unit net cash costs reported above $1.95 per pound.
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant. The information in
Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement. The information in
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) issued a press release dated April 23, 2026, announcing its first-quarter 2026 financial and operating results. A copy of the press release is furnished hereto as Exhibit 99.1.
Director — Robert W. Dudley: Mr. Dudley will not stand for re-election at the Company’s 2026 annual meeting of stockholders.