Reading EW? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track EW free→Reading EW? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track EW free→NYSEHealth CareMedical DevicesSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong. Earnings quality and management's track record are neutral. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Compared with sector peers, EW is above typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 41% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is expensive, growth-justified. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $85.11. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $85 the market pays 32× p/e — above the 23× p/e peer median but in line with its own 32× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $64 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with low confidence. Analysts: $85–$110. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 32% near-term growth, ahead of our forecast of about 17%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Health Care names rated strong grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 52% for the rest of the cohort, n=2344).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.24x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Health Care names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 50% for the rest of the cohort, n=2269).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.74 → $0.74 (+0.1% / 30d). 1 raised, 0 cut, 23 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 72% of analysts rate Buy.
Market and fundamentals agree. Analysts are positioned bullishly on a fundamentally strong name.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$108.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$222.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,273.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Valuation label changed from 'expensive' to 'full'.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Strong TMTT sales growth will confirm the success of new therapies like EVOQUE and PASCAL. This is key for overall revenue growth.
Confirms:TMTT sales growth exceeds 35% year over year in 2026.
Disproves:TMTT sales growth is below 35% year over year in 2026.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for EW yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Chief Financial Officer — Theodora Mistras: Edwards Lifesciences Corporation hired Theodora Mistras as the new Chief Financial Officer.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$85.00 – $110.00 (median $94.00) · 6 analysts · as of 2026-04-27
Looks more expensive than peers.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Health Care Equipment.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
EW Edwards Lifesciences | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 94 of 100 | full | moderate |
ABT Abbott Laboratories | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 93 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
ISRG Intuitive Surgical | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 94 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
SYK Stryker Corporation | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 67 of 100 | fair | moderate |
MDT Medtronic | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 89 of 100 | fair | moderate |
5 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Health Care names rated neutral grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 50% for the rest of the cohort, n=842).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLV
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Met or beat guidance 63% of the last 8 guided quarters · -12.2% avg surprise
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Edwards Lifesciences aims to increase its sales growth guidance for 2026.
Edwards Lifesciences is raising the midpoint of its full-year adjusted EPS guidance.
Edwards Lifesciences is expanding its TAVR sales growth guidance for 2026.
For the second quarter of 2026, the company projects total sales to be between $1.66 and $1.74 billion.
Why it matters: The sales growth guidance for Q2 will show if the company keeps its momentum. A strong guidance indicates ongoing demand for TAVR and TMTT products.
Confirms:Q2 2026 sales growth guidance is above 8% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 2026 sales growth guidance is below 8% year over year.
Why it matters: Strong TAVR sales growth is crucial for overall revenue and reflects market demand.
Confirms:TAVR sales growth reported above 9% year over year.
Disproves:TAVR sales growth reported below 7% year over year.
Why it matters: The PROGRESS trial results will show how well TAVR works for moderate aortic stenosis. Good results could lead to more use of TAVR.
Confirms:Positive results from the PROGRESS trial presented at the TCT conference.
Disproves:Negative results from the PROGRESS trial or no presentation at the TCT conference.
Why it matters: A favorable CMS decision could improve access to TAVR therapy, boosting sales. This is critical for expanding the patient base.
Confirms:CMS makes a positive decision on TAVR coverage.
Disproves:CMS keeps or denies changes to TAVR coverage.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On April 23, 2026, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Edwards”), issued a press release setting forth Edwards’ financial results for the first quarter of 2026. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1, and is incorporated herein by reference. The information furnished under this Item 2.02, including Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Approval of an amended and restated long-term stock incentive compensation program.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On February 10, 2026, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Edwards”), issued a press release setting forth Edwards’ financial results for the fourth quarter of 2025. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1, and is incorporated herein by reference. The information furnished under this Item 2.02, including Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as a…
Corporate Vice President and Group President, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Surgical Structural Heart — Larry L. Wood: Larry L. Wood resigned to accept a senior leadership position at another company.