Reading ERIE? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ERIE free→Reading ERIE? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ERIE free→
NASDAQFinancialsInsurance BrokersSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak, and earnings quality is neutral, indicating some challenges for ERIE. Management's recent track record is also neutral, and the sector backdrop presents a headwind. Compared with sector peers, ERIE's performance is typical, and risk is moderate. Peer multiples imply a price about 25% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair, but weakening, as it is priced roughly in line with peers, but recent financials or earnings quality are weakening. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 3 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $226.67. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
We can't anchor a clean multiple for ERIE right now, so treat our $182 fair value as low-confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 24% near-term growth, ahead of our forecast of about 7%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated weak grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 59% for the rest of the cohort, n=3730).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.16x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=4725).
Not enough signal yet.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the broad stock market, the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
2 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=5004).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $3.57 → $3.35 (-6.2% / 30d). 0 raised, 1 cut, 1 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 100% of analysts rate Buy.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 3 guided quarters · 13.3% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$146.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$354.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $4,297.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Management fee revenue growth is key for Erie Indemnity's overall performance. Slower growth could signal issues.
Confirms:Q2 management fee revenue growth falls below 4.2% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 management fee revenue growth meets or exceeds 4.2% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for ERIE yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer — Julie M. Pelkowski: Ms. Pelkowski is retiring after more than 25 years of service.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Not enough peers to compare yet.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Insurance Brokers.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
ERIE Erie Indemnity | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 46 of 100 | full | moderate |
MRSH Marsh McLennan | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 74 of 100 | full | moderate |
AON Aon plc | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 70 of 100 | full | moderate |
AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 72 of 100 | full | moderate |
WTW Willis Towers Watson | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 34 of 100 | fair | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on enhancing operating income through improved revenue and cost management.
Continue to provide stable and consistent dividend payouts to shareholders.
Improve cash flow from operations to support business activities and growth.
Why it matters: Investment income is a key revenue source. Changes could indicate shifts in financial health.
Confirms one read:Q2 investment income is higher than in Q1 2026.
Confirms the other:Q2 investment income is lower than in Q1 2026.
Why it matters: Erie Indemnity wants to keep paying dividends. Changes might affect how investors feel.
Confirms one read:The company announces a dividend payout like the ones before.
Confirms the other:The company reduces or suspends the dividend payout.
Why it matters: Operating income is important for checking how much money the company makes. A drop could worry investors.
Confirms:Q2 operating income is lower than in Q1 2026.
Disproves:Q2 operating income is higher or the same as in Q1 2026.
Why it matters: Strong operating income growth would show the company is on track to increase profits. This aligns with management's goal to boost operating income.
Confirms:Q2 operating income growth exceeds 5% year over year.
Disproves:Operating income growth is less than or equal to 5% year over year.
Why it matters: More cash from operations means better financial health. This helps support growth plans.
Confirms:Cash from operations increases by more than 10% compared to Q1.
Disproves:Cash from operations does not increase or declines compared to Q1.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On April 23, 2026, Erie Indemnity Company (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. Copies of the press release and financial information are attached hereto and are incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 99.1 and Exhibit 99.2, respectively. On April 24, 2026 at 10:00 a.m. the Company will provide a pre-recorded Webcast that is complementary to the press release announcing finan…
Other Events. (a) At its meeting on April 21, 2026, the Company's Board of Directors approved the following quarterly dividend on shares of Erie Indemnity Company Class A common stock: Dividend Number: 384 Class A Rate Per Share: $1.4625 Declaration Date: April 21, 2026 Ex-Dividend Date: July 7, 2026 Record Date: July 7, 2026 Payable Date: July 21, 2026 (b) In addition to his re-election to the Board, Jonathan Hirt Hagen was elected Chairman of the Board. Thomas B. Hagen, also re-elected to t…