Reading EL? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track EL free→Reading EL? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track EL free→NYSEConsumer StaplesHousehold & Personal ProductsSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral. Earnings quality is not assessable since the company is unprofitable. Management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent changes. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 60% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is expensive, growth-justified. This is because it is rich on today's multiple, but the three-year horizon reads cheaper once expected earnings growth is included. If EL cuts guidance on the next call, that would be a meaningful negative.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $89.68. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $90 the market pays 41× p/e — above the 18× p/e peer median but in line with its own 40× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $56 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with low confidence. Analysts: $72–$111. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 59% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about 8%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only expensive valuation — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Consumer Staples names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=1526).
Over the trailing year it converted -7.25x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
15 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Consumer Staples names rated volatile grew net income 42% of the time over the next year (vs 51% for the rest of the cohort, n=368).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.33 → $0.32 (-2.8% / 30d). 3 raised, 13 cut, 20 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 46% of analysts rate Buy.
2 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 5.3% above current price.
0 positive, 1 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 75% of the last 8 guided quarters · 72.8% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$199.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$393.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $4,361.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: If the company grows faster, it shows recovery and strong sales.
Confirms:Q4 organic sales growth reported above 5% year over year.
Disproves:Q4 organic sales growth reported below 3% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for EL yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. As announced on November 1, 2023, The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (the "Company") launched the Profit Recovery and Growth Plan ("PRGP") to help progressively rebuild its profit margins in fiscal years 2025 and 2026. As a component of the PRGP, on February 5, 2024, the Company announced a two-year restructuring program and filed a Current Report on Form 8-K. The Company committed to this course of action on February 1, 2024. At that time, the…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$72.00 – $111.00 (median $85.00) · 10 analysts · as of 2026-06-11
Looks more expensive than peers.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2, 2026-Q3
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Consumer Staples (broad).
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
EL Estée Lauder Companies (The) | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 33 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
WMT Walmart | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 30 of 100 | expensive | low |
COST Costco | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 50 of 100 | expensive | low |
KO Coca-Cola Company (The) | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 59 of 100 | expensive | low |
PG Procter & Gamble | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 67 of 100 | full | low |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLP
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on increasing organic sales growth, particularly in key regions and product categories.
Aim to increase adjusted operating margin through cost efficiencies and strategic investments.
Continue executing the Beauty Reimagined strategy to drive growth and innovation.
Aim to improve operating profitability through strategic initiatives and cost management.
Increase the adjusted earnings outlook based on strong performance and strategic initiatives.
Why it matters: This plan aims to rebuild profit margins. Progress signals better cost management.
Confirms:Management says profit margins are better because of the plan.
Disproves:Management says profit margins are still going down.
Why it matters: Progress on this plan is important for profits and cost control.
Confirms one read:Management says they reached important goals in the PRGP plan.
Confirms the other:Management reports delays or problems with the PRGP plan.
Why it matters: This shows that margin efforts are working and profits are better.
Confirms:Adjusted operating margin is 13% or higher for Q4.
Disproves:The operating margin is less than 12.5% for Q4.
Why it matters: New products can drive sales growth and enhance brand positioning.
Confirms:Announcement of new product launches that align with current beauty trends.
Disproves:No new product launches announced in Q2.
Other Events On March 23, 2026, The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (the “Company”) and Puig confirmed they were in discussions regarding a potential business combination, but unless and until an agreement was signed between the companies, there could be no assurances regarding the deal or its terms. On May 21, 2026, the Company and Puig announced that the parties have terminated discussions regarding a potential business combination. The Company issued a press release regarding the foregoing, a…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On May 1, 2026, The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing its financial results for its fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2026. The release includes the Company’s estimates related to certain of its fiscal 2026 and fiscal 2027 full year financial metrics. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.
Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. As announced on November 1, 2023, The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (the "Company") launched the Profit Recovery and Growth Plan ("PRGP") to help progressively rebuild its profit margins in fiscal years 2025 and 2026. As a component of the PRGP, on February 5, 2024, the Company announced a two-year restructuring program and filed a Current Report on Form 8-K. The Company committed to this course of action on February 1, 2024. At that time, the…
Other Events The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (the “Company”) confirms that it is in discussions regarding a potential business combination with Puig, in which the two companies would potentially merge their businesses. No final decision has been made, and no agreement has been reached. Unless and until an agreement is signed between the companies, there can be no assurances regarding the deal or its terms. On March 23, 2026, the Company issued a press release regarding the foregoing. A copy o…