Reading EG? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track EG free→Reading EG? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track EG free→
NYSEFinancialsInsurance - ReinsuranceSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is also neutral. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady, while risk is moderate and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 54% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, quality intact. Key factors to watch include potential guidance cuts and the performance of sector bellwethers, as these could significantly impact EG's outlook. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $339.40. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $339 EG trades at 6× p/e, below its 15× p/e peer median. Our $735 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $340–$376. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 54% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 13%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=4936).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.37x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=4725).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates.
Not enough signal yet.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $14.49 → $14.17 (-2.2% / 30d). 2 raised, 11 cut, 15 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 2 maintained. 38% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target -1.0% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$84.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$228.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,643.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
The signal label changed to mixed. Risk fell. The sector backdrop remains a headwind. Valuation is described as cheap, indicating that the stock trades below peer multiples while earnings quality is neutral.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A big drop in premiums shows ongoing problems in underwriting and market conditions.
Confirms:Q2 gross written premiums fall more than 10% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 gross written premiums decline less than 10% year over year or grow.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for EG yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
DISCLOSURE OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION On April 29, 2026, Everest Group, Ltd. (the "Registrant") issued a news release announcing its first quarter 2026 results. A copy of that news release is furnished herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference. In accordance with general instruction B.2 of Form 8-K, the information in this report, including exhibits, is furnished pursuant to
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$340.00 – $376.00 (median $365.00) · 5 analysts · as of 2026-05-21
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Financials (broad).
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
EG Everest Group | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 40 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 42 of 100 | full | moderate |
JPM JPMorgan Chase | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 35 of 100 | full | low |
V Visa Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 79 of 100 | expensive | low |
MA Mastercard | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 68 of 100 | expensive | low |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on increasing shareholder returns through share repurchases and dividends.
Enhance underwriting practices to improve profitability and risk management.
Target growth in Global Wholesale & Specialty markets where competitive advantages exist.
Why it matters: A high combined ratio means losses in underwriting. This may show bigger profit problems.
Confirms:Q2 combined ratio exceeds 95%.
Disproves:Q2 combined ratio stays below 95%.
Why it matters: Faster capital return can boost shareholder value and show strong financial health.
Confirms:Management announces a big rise in share buybacks or dividends in Q2.
Disproves:Management shows a slowdown or pause in capital return plans.