Reading ED? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ED free→Reading ED? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ED free→
NYSEUtilitiesUtilities - Regulated ElectricSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, with robust earnings quality and stable management. Risk is low, but the sector backdrop presents a headwind, while the company's earnings yield is above typical for the sector, indicating a cheap valuation. Peer multiples imply a price about 12% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair, quality intact. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $107.74. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $108 ED trades at 19× p/e, below its 20× p/e peer median. Our $125 fair value sits above the price; medium confidence. Analysts: $97–$118. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 14% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 11%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Utilities names rated strong grew net income 61% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=906).
Over the trailing year it converted 30.64x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Utilities names rated robust grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=832).
Most sensitive to real (inflation-adjusted) rates and long-term interest rates.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, the broad stock market, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.71 → $0.76 (+7.1% / 30d). 5 raised, 0 cut, 7 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 1 downgrade / 30d, 0 maintained. 16% of analysts rate Buy.
2 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target -3.3% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$78.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$178.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,038.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Approval lets Con Edison spend money on important projects for future growth.
Confirms:Public announcement of approval for the three-year rate plan by the commission.
Disproves:Denial or delay of the capital investment plans by the commission.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for ED yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement On May 8, 2026, Consolidated Edison, Inc. (“Con Edison” or the “Company”) entered into an equity distribution agreement (the “Equity Distribution Agreement”) with Barclays Capital Inc., BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC, BofA Securities, Inc., CIBC World Markets Corp., Jefferies LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., Mizuho Securities USA LLC, Scotia Capital (USA) Inc., TD Securities (USA) LLC and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, ea…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$97.00 – $118.00 (median $105.00) · 12 analysts · as of 2026-06-02
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Multi-Utilities.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
ED Consolidated Edison | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 91 of 100 | fair | low |
NEE NextEra Energy | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 66 of 100 | full | low |
SRE Sempra | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 42 of 100 | fair | low |
D Dominion Energy | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 30 of 100 | fair | low |
XEL Xcel Energy | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 58 of 100 | fair | low |
1 material management or governance event in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Utilities names rated stable grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 56% for the rest of the cohort, n=3736).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLU
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Maintain the adjusted EPS guidance range for 2026 between $6.00 and $6.20.
Continue investments in infrastructure to support a modern and resilient grid.
Focus on managing costs while making critical investments for the clean energy transition.
Target a compounded annual EPS growth rate of 6-7% over five years.
Why it matters: The EPS guidance shows confidence in earnings. It shows management cares about financial goals.
Confirms:Management says the adjusted EPS guidance is between $6.00 and $6.20 per share.
Disproves:Management lowers the adjusted EPS guidance to below $6.00 per share.
Why it matters: If they meet or exceed this guidance, it shows strong earnings and growth confidence.
Confirms:Q2 adjusted EPS guidance reported at $6.10 or higher.
Disproves:Q2 adjusted EPS guidance falls below $6.00.
Why it matters: More dividend growth shows the company is doing well and cares about shareholders.
Confirms:Announcement of an increase in the dividend payout ratio or amount.
Disproves:Announcement of a dividend freeze or cut.
of Form 8-K. Exhibit 104 Cover Page Interactive Data File - The cover page iXBRL tags are embedded within the inline XBRL document. -3- SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized. CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. By /s/ Joseph Miller Joseph Miller Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer Da…