Reading DV? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track DV free→Reading DV? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track DV free→NYSECommunication ServicesAdvertising AgenciesSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but risk is elevated and the sector backdrop presents a headwind. Earnings quality is neutral, and compared with sector peers, DV is above typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 9% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $10.20. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $10 DV trades at 12× p/e, in line with its 12× p/e peer median. Our $9.37 fair value reflects that, medium confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 9% near-term growth, in line with our forecast of about 15%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
No fragility gates fired. Regime (Crisis) does not concentrate fragility.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Communication Services names rated strong grew net income 63% of the time over the next year (vs 52% for the rest of the cohort, n=701).
Over the trailing year it converted 3.25x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Communication Services names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 48% for the rest of the cohort, n=690).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.27 → $0.27 (+0.9% / 30d). 4 raised, 2 cut, 9 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 55% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$149.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$448.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $4,708.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: If it goes above $20M, it shows good cost control. This can help make more money.
Confirms:Operating income was above $20M for Q2.
Disproves:Operating income was below $15M for Q2.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for DV yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
and in Exhibit 99.1 attached to this Form 8-K shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing made by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing, unless expressly incorporated by specific reference…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Advertising.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
DV DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 72 of 100 | full | elevated |
OMC Omnicom Group | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 93 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
TTD Trade Desk (The) | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 80 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
MGNI Magnite, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 86 of 100 | expensive | high |
ZD Ziff Davis | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 38 of 100 | fair | elevated |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLC
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on achieving a year-over-year revenue increase of 8% to 10% for 2026.
Continue efforts to improve operating income through strategic initiatives.
Aim to boost net income through revenue growth and cost management.
Why it matters: If sector growth slows, it may hurt DoubleVerify's performance and outlook.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth reported below its median.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth reported at or above its median.
Why it matters: This growth rate is key to meeting management's goal of increasing revenue. A drop could signal trouble.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth reported below 15% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth reported above 15% year over year.
Why it matters: Net income growth is crucial for long-term success. A slowdown could raise concerns.
Confirms:Net income growth reported below 10% year over year.
Disproves:Net income growth reported above 10% year over year.
Why it matters: If net income goes over $8M, it shows better profit plans. This can help how the market sees them.
Confirms:Net income reported above $8M for Q2.
Disproves:Net income reported below $5M for Q2.
Why it matters: Better growth signals in the sector may help DoubleVerify. This could lead to improved results.
Confirms one read:Sector revenue growth reported above 8% year over year.
Confirms the other:Sector revenue growth reported below 4% year over year.