Reading DUK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track DUK free→Reading DUK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track DUK free→
NYSEUtilitiesUtilities - Regulated ElectricSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but earnings quality is neutral. Risk is low, while the sector backdrop is a headwind, indicating challenges in the broader market. Compared with sector peers, DUK trades above typical levels. Peer multiples imply a price about 5% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair. This analysis is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $124.97. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $125 DUK trades at 19× p/e, below its 20× p/e peer median. Our $134 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Analysts: $132–$142. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 7% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 12%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Utilities names rated strong grew net income 61% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=906).
Over the trailing year it converted 2.27x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Utilities names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=1075).
Most sensitive to real (inflation-adjusted) rates and long-term interest rates.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, the broad stock market, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.25 → $1.25 (-0.5% / 30d). 1 raised, 3 cut, 13 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 46% of analysts rate Buy.
3 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 11.8% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$78.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$149.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,088.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: When management confirms guidance, it shows they are confident in growth targets.
Confirms:Management confirms adjusted EPS guidance of $6.55 to $6.80 for 2026 during the Q2 earnings call.
Disproves:Management cuts adjusted EPS guidance to below $6.55 during the Q2 earnings call.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Advances: $103 billion five-year capital plan
Increases funding for capital plan, supporting growth objectives.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
. 104 Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document). SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized. DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION /s/ ABIGAIL L. MOTSINGER Abigail L. Motsinger Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller Dated: May 5, 2026
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$132.00 – $142.00 (median $139.00) · 9 analysts · as of 2026-06-02
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Electric Utilities.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
DUK Duke Energy | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 82 of 100 | fair | low |
SO Southern Company | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 68 of 100 | fair | low |
CEG Constellation Energy | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 60 of 100 | full | elevated |
AEP American Electric Power | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 43 of 100 | full | low |
ETR Entergy | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 46 of 100 | full | low |
Not enough signal yet.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLU
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Duke Energy aims for a long-term adjusted EPS growth rate of 5% to 7% through 2030.
Duke Energy is executing a $103 billion capital plan over five years to drive growth.
Duke Energy is focused on keeping energy rates affordable for customers.
Why it matters: Higher O&M expenses can hurt margins and impact profits.
Confirms:O&M expenses increase more than 5% year over year in Q2 2026.
Disproves:O&M expenses increase less than 2% year over year in Q2 2026.
Why it matters: Progress on this plan is key to achieving the targeted 5% to 7% EPS growth.
Confirms:Management says they have completed key steps in the capital plan.
Disproves:No major updates or delays are reported on the capital plan.
Why it matters: Aligning EPS growth with the 5% to 7% target is crucial for investor confidence.
Confirms one read:Quarterly EPS growth meets or exceeds 5% year-over-year.
Confirms the other:Quarterly EPS growth is less than 5% compared to last year.
Why it matters: Changes in tax rates can affect net income and overall profits.
Confirms one read:Effective tax rate decreases below 10% for Q2 2026.
Confirms the other:Effective tax rate increases above 12% for Q2 2026.
Advances: $103 billion five-year capital plan
Increases funding for capital plan, supporting growth objectives.
Increased demand may pressure energy rates.
Increased demand may pressure energy rates.
Advances: $103 billion five-year capital plan
Federal grants support capital plan and growth objectives.
Advances: $103 billion five-year capital plan
Federal grants support capital plan and growth objectives.