Reading DOCU? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track DOCU free→Reading DOCU? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track DOCU free→
NASDAQInformation TechnologySoftware - ApplicationSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, and earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Management's recent track record has been steady, but risk is elevated. The sector backdrop is a tailwind, and compared with sector peers, DOCU is above typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 23% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair, quality intact. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $45.03. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $45 DOCU trades at 11× p/e, below its 21× p/e peer median. Our $59 fair value sits above the price; medium confidence. Analysts: $45–$70. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 23% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 9%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 3 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated strong grew net income 73% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2777).
Over the trailing year it converted 3.92x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated robust grew net income 69% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=2129).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.06 → $1.09 (+2.4% / 30d). 12 raised, 2 cut, 19 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 6 maintained. 23% of analysts rate Buy.
3 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 16.2% above current price.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
Market and fundamentals agree. Analysts are positioned bullishly on a fundamentally strong name.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$159.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$514.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $5,089.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
The signal changed to "mild favorable," indicating a shift in sentiment. Risk fell, suggesting a decrease in perceived volatility. The macro backdrop remains a tailwind, while the sector backdrop is also favorable. The company’s earnings quality is robust, and management is stable.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Meeting or exceeding this growth rate shows Docusign is on track with its revenue goals. It also reflects strong demand for its AI-native IAM platform.
Confirms:Q2 revenue reported at $865 million or higher, reflecting at least 8% growth year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue was below $865 million. This shows growth under 8%.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for DOCU yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On June 4, 2026, Docusign, Inc. (the “Company”) reported financial results for the three months ended April 30, 2026. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K. The press release is being furnished and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section or Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) o…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$45.00 – $70.00 (median $56.50) · 6 analysts · as of 2026-06-05
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2, 2026-Q3, 2027-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Application Software.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
DOCU Docusign | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 98 of 100 | fair | elevated |
ORCL Oracle Corporation | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 65 of 100 | full | elevated |
PLTR Palantir Technologies | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 79 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
SAP SAP SE | — | — | elevated |
APP AppLovin | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 62 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
1 material management or governance event in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Information Technology names rated stable grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 62% for the rest of the cohort, n=797).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on expanding the AI-native Intelligent Agreement Management platform with new capabilities and integrations.
Continue to drive revenue growth through strategic initiatives and product enhancements.
Focus on enhancing free cash flow through operational efficiencies and strategic initiatives.
Focus on increasing revenue growth through strategic initiatives.
Improve operating income through cost management and efficiency.
Why it matters: High free cash flow shows strong financial health and good capital management.
Confirms:Free cash flow reported above $289 million for Q2.
Disproves:Free cash flow reported below $289 million for Q2.
Why it matters: If sector revenue growth drops, it may impact Docusign's growth. This is important as the sector is currently in a growth phase.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth reported below its median.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth remains above its median.
Why it matters: Changes in monetary policy can impact Docusign's growth and cost of capital. Investors need to assess how this affects the tech sector.
Confirms one read:FOMC decides to lower or keep interest rates the same. This helps growth.
Confirms the other:FOMC decides to raise interest rates. This could slow down growth.
Why it matters: If operating income is over this amount, it shows Docusign is controlling costs well. This helps their goal of increasing operating income.
Confirms:Operating income was over $90M for Q2.
Disproves:Operating income was under $80M for Q2.
Why it matters: Exceeding this amount shows Docusign is improving cash flow. It supports their goal of enhancing cash from operations.
Confirms:Cash from operations reported above $400M for Q2.
Disproves:Cash from operations reported below $350M for Q2.
Director — Rowan Trollope: Rowan Trollope was appointed as a new director to fill an existing vacancy.