Reading DIS? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track DIS free→Reading DIS? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track DIS free→
NYSECommunication ServicesEntertainmentSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong. Earnings quality is fragile, meaning profits lack cash support. Management's recent track record has been steady. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Compared with sector peers, DIS is above typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 44% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is expensive, growth-justified. This means it is rich on today's multiple, but the three-year horizon reads cheaper once expected earnings growth is included. The read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $100.04. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $100 DIS trades at 17× p/e, below its 19× p/e peer median. Our $73 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $119–$164. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 38% of near-term growth above a flat-multiple fair value; not enough history to forecast a comparison. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack. Regime (Crisis) does not concentrate fragility.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Communication Services names rated strong grew net income 63% of the time over the next year (vs 52% for the rest of the cohort, n=701).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.41x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Communication Services names rated fragile grew net income 43% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=525).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.86 → $1.87 (+0.1% / 30d). 8 raised, 9 cut, 21 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 90% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$88.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$198.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,497.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: If Disney meets this target, it shows they can grow earnings. This shows strength and investor trust.
Confirms:Q3 adjusted EPS growth of 12% or more compared to the previous year.
Disproves:Q3 adjusted EPS growth falls below 10%.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for DIS yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 6, 2026, the Registrant issued an earnings release relating to its results for the quarter ended March 28, 2026. A copy of the earnings release is furnished herewith as Exhibit 99.1. Use of Website to Distribute Material Company Information The Registrant’s Investor Relations website is www.disney.com/investors. We use our Investor Relations website as a means of disclosing material non-public information and for the purpose of complying w…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$119.00 – $164.00 (median $146.00) · 5 analysts · as of 2026-05-07
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Movies & Entertainment.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
DIS Walt Disney Company (The) | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 92 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
NFLX Netflix | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 70 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
TKO TKO Group Holdings | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 31 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
LYV Live Nation Entertainment | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 29 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
ROKU Roku Inc | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 82 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
5 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Communication Services names rated neutral grew net income 53% of the time over the next year (vs 63% for the rest of the cohort, n=271).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLC
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Met or beat guidance 0% of the last 2 guided quarters · -45.2% avg surprise
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Achieve double-digit adjusted EPS growth in fiscal 2026, including the impact of the 53rd week.
Target at least $8 billion in share repurchases in fiscal 2026.
Achieve an increase in SVOD operating income by approximately $200 million compared to Q2 fiscal 2025.
Why it matters: If Disney grows, it shows their streaming plan is working. This can boost investor trust in their digital future.
Confirms:Q2 SVOD operating income goes up by $200 million from the last quarter.
Disproves:SVOD operating income growth is less than $100 million.
Why it matters: Earnings results will show how Disney is doing financially and its plans for growth.
Confirms one read:Earnings report shows better than expected revenue and EPS growth.
Confirms the other:Earnings report shows worse than expected revenue and EPS growth.
Why it matters: When management buys back shares, it shows they believe in the company's value. This can help the stock price.
Confirms:They announced share buybacks of at least $8 billion.
Disproves:They did not announce big share buybacks by the end of fiscal 2026.
Why it matters: This program shows Disney's commitment to returning value to shareholders. It can boost stock price.
Confirms:They announced progress on the $7 billion stock buyback.
Disproves:No updates or delays in the stock repurchase program.
Why it matters: Attendance trends will show if Disney remains popular. This is important during tough times and competition.
Confirms one read:Domestic park attendance goes up year over year after the summer.
Confirms the other:Domestic park attendance goes down year over year after the summer.
Director — Josh D’Amaro: Josh D'Amaro was promoted to Director and appointed to the Executive Committee.
Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Communications Officer — Kristina K. Schake: The company terminated Kristina K. Schake's employment without cause.
Other Events. On February 27, 2026, The Walt Disney Company (the “Company”) entered into (i) a 364-Day Credit Agreement, among the Company, as borrower, TWDC Enterprises 18 Corp. (“TWDC Enterprises”), as guarantor, the lenders party thereto, and Citibank, N.A., as designated agent, which provides for advances to be made available to the Company in an aggregate principal amount of up to $5.25 billion (the “364-Day Credit Agreement”) and replaces the Company’s $5.25 billion 364-Day Credit Agree…
Chief Executive Officer — Josh D’Amaro: Josh D'Amaro was promoted to CEO, and Bob Iger became Senior Advisor.