Reading DGX? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track DGX free→Reading DGX? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track DGX free→NYSEHealth CareDiagnostics & ResearchSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes. Earnings quality is mixed, and risk is moderate, while the sector backdrop is a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 3% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair, priced roughly in line with peer multiples. The company is not currently profitable, so the read leans on sales- and cash-based methods. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $203.06. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $203 DGX trades at 20× p/e, in line with its 19× p/e peer median. Our $198 fair value reflects that, medium confidence. Analysts: $210–$235. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 2% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about -60%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Health Care names rated strong grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 52% for the rest of the cohort, n=2344).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.81x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Health Care names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 50% for the rest of the cohort, n=2269).
Not enough signal yet.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, the broad stock market, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
4 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Health Care names rated volatile grew net income 43% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=600).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $2.87 → $2.82 (-1.5% / 30d). 2 raised, 10 cut, 14 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 50% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$81.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$197.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,156.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: If it drops below this level, it may show less demand in diagnostic services.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth reported below 6.8% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth remains above 6.8% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for DGX yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement On May 6, 2026, Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (the “Company”) issued $500,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 5.000% senior notes due 2036 (the “Notes”). The Company will pay interest on the Notes on June 30 and December 30 of each year, beginning on December 30, 2026. The Notes will mature on June 30, 2036. The Notes will be the senior unsecured obligations of the Company and will rank equally with the Company’s other existing and future senior u…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$210.00 – $235.00 (median $225.00) · 4 analysts · as of 2026-04-21
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Health Care Services.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
DGX Quest Diagnostics | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 68 of 100 | full | moderate |
CVS CVS Health | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 60 of 100 | fair | moderate |
CI Cigna | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 88 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
LH Labcorp | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 75 of 100 | fair | moderate |
DVA DaVita | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 83 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLV
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on increasing revenue growth as a strategic priority.
Commitment to enhancing EPS growth as a key financial objective.
Maintain disciplined management of capital expenditures.
Why it matters: If adjusted EPS stays within this range, it confirms strong earnings growth and effective cost management.
Confirms:Adjusted EPS reported within the range of $10.63 to $10.83.
Disproves:Adjusted EPS falls below $10.63.
Why it matters: Earnings results will show if revenue growth is improving or still behind. Investors will react to the growth trend.
Confirms:Q2 earnings report shows revenue growth above 5% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 earnings report shows revenue growth below 0% year over year.
Why it matters: Good management of capital spending helps EPS growth. This affects the company's financial health.
Confirms:Management plans to cut capital spending by 10% or more.
Disproves:Management says capital spending is going up beyond current levels.
Why it matters: If it drops below this level, it may show cash flow problems that affect spending.
Confirms:Cash flow from operations was below $1.75 billion.
Disproves:Cash flow from operations remains at or above $1.75 billion.
Why it matters: A drop in revenue growth could signal a shift in the sector's growth phase. This would impact investor confidence.
Confirms:Revenue growth falls below the sector median of 1% year over year.
Disproves:Revenue growth remains above the sector median of 1% year over year.
Why it matters: Doing this well may help Quest's market position and increase future revenue.
Confirms:A big milestone was reached in the Co-Lab Solutions project.
Disproves:There is a delay or setback in the Co-Lab Solutions project timeline.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On April 21, 2026, Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (the "Company") issued a press release announcing, among other things, its results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated by reference herein.
Other Events On April 27, 2026, Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing the pricing of a public offering of $500 million aggregate principal amount of its 5.000% senior notes due 2036 (the “Notes”) under the Company’s shelf registration statement. The Company intends to use the net proceeds from the offering for general corporate purposes, which may include the repayment of indebtedness. The indebtedness the Company may repay includes its $500 million…
Director — Timothy Wentworth: Mr. Timothy Wentworth was elected as a new director and appointed to two committees.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On February 10, 2026, Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (the "Company") issued a press release announcing, among other things, its results for the quarter and full year ended December 31, 2025. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated by reference herein.