Reading DELL? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track DELL free→Reading DELL? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track DELL free→
NYSEInformation TechnologyComputer HardwareSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes. Earnings quality is mixed, and risk is elevated, while the sector backdrop is a tailwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 34% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair. The outlook hinges on whether DELL cuts guidance on the next call, which could negatively impact estimates. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $395.57. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $396 DELL trades at 29× p/e — 1.3× the 22× p/e peer median, and above its own 13× history. The market is re-rating it beyond its own range; our $306 fair value is medium-confidence here. Analysts: $101–$700. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 29% of near-term growth above a flat-multiple fair value; not enough history to forecast a comparison. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 3 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated strong grew net income 73% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2777).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.48x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 62% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2831).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $2.94 → $4.88 (+66.2% / 30d). 19 raised, 0 cut, 22 covering analysts.
2 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 18 maintained. 71% of analysts rate Buy.
16 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 21.9% above current price.
1 positive, 2 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
Market and fundamentals agree. Analysts are positioned bullishly on a fundamentally strong name.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 50% of the last 2 guided quarters · -20.6% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$266.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$489.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,232.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Valuation rose by 28.1 points (from 14.9 to 43.0).
Valuation label changed from 'full' to 'expensive'.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Strong revenue growth would show that Dell is on track with its growth goals.
Confirms:Q1 revenue growth reported above 10% year over year.
Disproves:Q1 revenue growth reported below 5% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for DELL yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
of this Current Report on Form 8-K is incorporated by reference herein. Existing Credit Agreement In connection with the entry into the Credit Agreement, on June 10, 2026, Dell International and EMC repaid all outstanding obligations under the credit agreement, dated as of November 1, 2021, among the Company, Denali Intermediate Inc., Dell Inc., Dell International, EMC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and each of the lenders and other parties from time to time party theret…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$101.00 – $700.00 (median $350.00) · 23 analysts · as of 2026-06-01
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2, 2026-Q3, 2027-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
DELL Dell Technologies | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 89 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
AAPL Apple Inc | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 74 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
SNDK Sandisk | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 75 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
STX Seagate Technology | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 62 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
WDC Western Digital | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 73 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
15 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Information Technology names rated volatile grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=793).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Dell aims to achieve significant revenue growth, with a focus on AI-optimized servers and infrastructure solutions.
Dell is focused on increasing its non-GAAP EPS, with significant year-over-year growth expected.
Dell aims to boost its first-quarter revenue significantly, reflecting strong demand and execution.
Why it matters: A drop could indicate a slowdown in the IT sector, affecting Dell's growth.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth is below its median for two months in a row.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth remains above its median for the same period.
Why it matters: A rise in non-GAAP EPS shows better profits and financial health.
Confirms:Non-GAAP EPS reported up more than 5% year over year.
Disproves:Non-GAAP EPS reported flat or down year over year.
Why it matters: Updates on capital use will show how recent stock sales affect growth plans.
Confirms one read:Management shares a clear plan for using money from stock sales to boost growth.
Confirms the other:Management has no clear plan for how to use the money from stock sales.
Other Events On June 11, 2026, Dell Technologies Inc. (the “Company”), Dell International L.L.C. (“Dell International”), EMC Corporation (together with Dell International, the “Issuers”) and the other Guarantors (as defined below) entered into an underwriting agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”) with Barclays Capital Inc., BofA Securities, Inc., Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and PNC Capital Markets LLC, as representatives of the several un…
and in Exhibit 99.1 to this current report is being “furnished” with the Securities and Exchange Commission and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities under such section. Further, such information shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, unless specifically identifi…
of this report). The Credit Agreement, which matures on June 10, 2031, provides Dell International and EMC with revolving commitments in an aggregate principal amount of $6,000,000,000 and with a letter of credit sub-facility of up to $500,000,000. The Credit Agreement also allows Dell International and EMC to request incremental commitments on one or more occasions in a minimum amount of $10,000,000. The proceeds of the Loans (under and as defined in the Credit Agreement) will be used by Del…
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant. The information set forth in