Reading DAR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track DAR free→Reading DAR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track DAR free→
NYSEConsumer StaplesPackaged FoodsSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, with robust earnings quality and stable management. However, the sector backdrop is a headwind, and the risk is moderate. Peer multiples imply a price about 90% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is expensive, growth-justified, as it is rich on today's multiple but the three-year horizon reads cheaper once expected earnings growth is included. Key factors to watch include any potential guidance cuts and the performance of sector bellwethers. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $56.99. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $57 DAR trades at 40× p/e — 2.3× the 17× p/e peer median, and above its own 19× history. The market is re-rating it beyond its own range; our $30 fair value is low-confidence here. Analysts: $57–$75. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 87% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about 8%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only expensive valuation — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Consumer Staples names rated strong grew net income 66% of the time over the next year (vs 53% for the rest of the cohort, n=1144).
Over the trailing year it converted 4.32x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Consumer Staples names rated robust grew net income 64% of the time over the next year (vs 51% for the rest of the cohort, n=1037).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.98 → $1.33 (+35.4% / 30d). 7 raised, 1 cut, 9 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 100% of analysts rate Buy.
Market and fundamentals agree. Analysts are positioned bullishly on a fundamentally strong name.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$130.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$344.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,461.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Growth in operating income shows good cost management. It also shows better efficiency.
Confirms:Operating income growth exceeds 10% year over year in Q2.
Disproves:Operating income growth is below 10% year over year in Q2.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for DAR yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Regulation FD Disclosure. During the 2026 Investor Day that Darling Ingredients Inc. (the “Company”) will host on May 11, 2026, the Company will present the material contained in the slide presentation furnished as Exhibit 99.1 with this Current Report on Form 8-K (the “Current Report”). The slide presentation will also be available via the investor relations/events section of the Company’s website. The information in this Current Report and Exhibit 99.1 shall not be deemed “filed” for purpos…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$57.00 – $75.00 (median $65.50) · 8 analysts · as of 2026-05-04
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Agricultural Products & Services.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
DAR Darling Ingredients | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 53 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
ADM Archer Daniels Midland | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 77 of 100 | full | moderate |
BG Bunge Global | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 97 of 100 | fair | moderate |
INGR Ingredion | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 63 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 18 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
1 material management or governance event in the past 24 months, led by M&A activity. Historically, Consumer Staples names rated stable grew net income 53% of the time over the next year (vs 47% for the rest of the cohort, n=379).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLP
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on developing strategic partnerships to enhance growth and market presence.
Continue efforts to enhance operating income through cost management and efficiency improvements.
Focus on improving gross profit through strategic initiatives and operational efficiencies.
Why it matters: Higher gross profit shows good cost management. It also shows smart pricing strategies.
Confirms:Gross profit increases year over year by more than 15% in Q2.
Disproves:Gross profit growth is less than 15% year over year in Q2.
Why it matters: Sales volume affects revenue and profit. It helps us understand the fuel segment's health.
Confirms one read:Diamond Green Diesel sales volume will rise above 300 million gallons next quarter.
Confirms the other:Sales volume drops below 250 million gallons in the next quarter.
Why it matters: Details on new partnerships could signal growth potential for Darling Ingredients. Limited progress so far raises questions.
Confirms:A new partnership has been announced. It will have a big financial impact.
Disproves:No new partnerships have been announced. There are delays in developing partnerships.
. 99.2 Slide Presentation for April 30 , 202 6 Earnings Call (furnished pursuant to Item 7 .0 1 ). 104 Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within Inline XBRL document) 2 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized. DARLING INGREDIENTS INC. Date: April 30, 2026 By: /s/ Nick Kemphaus Nick Kemphaus Executive Vice President, General Counsel 3