Reading CRL? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track CRL free→Reading CRL? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track CRL free→NYSEHealth CareDiagnostics & ResearchSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes. Earnings quality cannot be assessed since the company was unprofitable over the past year. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, which may impact performance compared to sector peers, where it is typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 14% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair, but weakening. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $187.51. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $188 CRL trades at 25× p/e, below its 27× p/e peer median. Our $213 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Analysts: $175–$220. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 12% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 4%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Health Care names rated neutral grew net income 50% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=3115).
Over the trailing year it converted -3.29x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
11 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Health Care names rated volatile grew net income 43% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=600).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $2.70 → $2.73 (+1.2% / 30d). 4 raised, 3 cut, 12 covering analysts.
1 upgrade, 0 downgrades / 30d, 0 maintained. 76% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 20.8% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$189.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$415.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,388.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: More bookings in the DSA segment would show positive demand trends. This supports revenue growth.
Confirms:DSA segment bookings increase year over year in Q2 2026.
Disproves:DSA segment bookings decline year over year in Q2 2026.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for CRL yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition The following information shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing. On May 7, 2026, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. issued a press release providing financial re…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$175.00 – $220.00 (median $211.50) · 10 analysts · as of 2026-05-29
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Life Sciences Tools & Services.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
CRL Charles River Laboratories | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 54 of 100 | fair | elevated |
TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 95 of 100 | fair | moderate |
DHR Danaher Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 98 of 100 | fair | moderate |
A Agilent Technologies | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 90 of 100 | fair | moderate |
WAT Waters Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 89 of 100 | fair | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLV
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on completing divestitures to streamline and enhance the company's portfolio.
Continue the stock repurchase program to enhance shareholder value.
Focus on improving client experience and strengthening the scientific portfolio.
Focus on acquisitions that align with core competencies to drive growth.
Implement efficiency and process improvements to enhance operational performance.
Why it matters: More stock buybacks could show management's trust in the company's value. This may help the share price.
Confirms:A notice of more stock buybacks over $200 million in Q2 2026.
Disproves:No stock buybacks announced in Q2 2026. This may show a lack of confidence.
Why it matters: Stable organic revenue growth would show recovery in the DSA and RMS segments. This follows recent declines.
Confirms:Organic revenue growth in Q2 2026 reported at least flat compared to Q1 2026.
Disproves:Organic revenue continues to decline in Q2 2026, worsening from Q1 2026.
Why it matters: Higher margins show better efficiency and cost control.
Confirms:Non-GAAP operating margin is better than in Q1 2026.
Disproves:Non-GAAP operating margin drops more in Q2 2026.
Why it matters: New acquisitions could enhance growth and align with Charles River's core strengths.
Confirms:A new acquisition that fits with main skills is announced.
Disproves:No news on acquisitions or delays in planned deals.
Corporate Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer — Glenn Coleman: The company hired a new CFO with extensive experience in the healthcare sector.
Shareholders approved the Company’s 2026 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition The following information shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing. On February 18, 2026, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. issued a press release providing financ…
Regulation FD Disclosure The following information shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing. Planned Divestiture of CDMO and Cell Solutions Businesses On February 25, 2026, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (t…