Reading CRBG? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track CRBG free→Reading CRBG? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track CRBG free→
NYSEFinancialsAsset ManagementSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak, and management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes. Earnings quality is robust, and the company has a capital-friendly stance. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, with performance below typical compared to sector peers. Peer multiples imply a price roughly in line with where it trades (about fair); the read is fair, but weakening. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $28.74. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $29 CRBG trades at 21× p/e — 1.4× the 15× p/e peer median, and above its own 11× history. The market is re-rating it beyond its own range; our $31 fair value is low-confidence here. Analysts: $29–$35. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price sits about 8% below a flat-multiple fair value; not enough history to forecast a comparison. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated weak grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 59% for the rest of the cohort, n=3730).
Over the trailing year it converted 6.68x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated robust grew net income 62% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=3541).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.17 → $1.17 (+0.4% / 30d). 2 raised, 8 cut, 13 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 73% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 11.8% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$160.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$349.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,633.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A big drop in premiums and deposits shows less demand for Corebridge's products.
Confirms:Q2 premiums and deposits were below $7.2 billion.
Disproves:Q2 premiums and deposits stabilize or grow year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for CRBG yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
are being “furnished” herewith and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall they be deemed to be incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$29.00 – $35.00 (median $31.00) · 4 analysts · as of 2026-05-26
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Asset Management & Custody Banks.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
CRBG Corebridge Financial | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 10 of 100 | fair | elevated |
BLK BlackRock | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 65 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
BX Blackstone Inc. | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 23 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
BNY BNY Mellon | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 62 of 100 | expensive | low |
BK BNY Mellon | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 100 of 100 | inexpensive | high |
3 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Financials names rated volatile grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=3774).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Complete the merger with Equitable to enhance scale, diversification, and cash generation.
Continue returning capital to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases.
Enhance customer experience by digitizing processes across the customer journey.
Corebridge Financial announced a share buyback program to enhance shareholder value.
Corebridge Financial continues to maintain its dividend payments to shareholders.
Why it matters: Better operating income means the company is doing better. It also shows good management.
Confirms:Operating income stays positive or gets better in the next quarter.
Disproves:Operating income drops back into the negative in the next quarter.
Why it matters: The buyback program could boost earnings per share and investor confidence. Monitoring its effect is key.
Confirms:Earnings per share shows a noticeable increase due to the buyback program.
Disproves:Earnings per share remains flat or declines despite the buyback program.
Why it matters: Steady or rising dividends show that a company is doing well. It also shows they care about their investors.
Confirms:Corebridge Financial maintains or raises the dividend per share in the next quarter.
Disproves:Dividend per share is cut or not increased in the next quarter.
Interim Chief Financial Officer — Christopher Filiaggi: Christopher Filiaggi was promoted to Interim Chief Financial Officer, replacing Elias Habayeb.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. Corebridge Financial, Inc. (the Company, we or our) is furnishing this Current Report on Form 8-K to disclose preliminary information related to variable investment income prior to the availability of the Company’s quarterly’s earnings release and quarterly financial supplement for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, scheduled for release on May 4, 2026. Based on preliminary results received to date, the Company estimates that its variable investme…
Director — Hirotaka Inoue (new appointee), Minoru Kimura (departing): Minoru Kimura is resigning as a director, and Hirotaka Inoue is being appointed to replace him.
is being “furnished” herewith and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing. Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information This Current Report on Form 8-K includes statements, which, to the extent…