Reading COHR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track COHR free→Reading COHR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track COHR free→
NYSEInformation TechnologyScientific & Technical InstrumentsSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong. Earnings quality is fragile, meaning profits lack cash support. Management's recent track record has been steady. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a tailwind. Compared with sector peers, COHR trades below typical levels. Peer multiples imply a price about 156% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is expensive, growth-justified. This is due to rich multiples today, but the three-year horizon reads cheaper with expected earnings growth included. Key factors to watch include guidance changes and sector trends.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $385.03. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $385 COHR trades at 79× p/e — 2.6× the 31× p/e peer median, and above its own 28× history. The market is re-rating it beyond its own range; our $150 fair value is low-confidence here. Analysts: $230–$455. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 156% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about 9%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Flags: expensive valuation, weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating).
For similar setups historically (n=889): about 49% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 85% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated strong grew net income 73% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2777).
Over the trailing year it converted 0.30x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated fragile grew net income 46% of the time over the next year (vs 65% for the rest of the cohort, n=2129).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.53 → $1.62 (+5.8% / 30d). 11 raised, 0 cut, 19 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 80% of analysts rate Buy.
Market and fundamentals agree. Analysts are positioned bullishly on a fundamentally strong name.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$345.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$755.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,652.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: This guidance will show if the company can maintain its growth momentum. Strong guidance supports confidence in ongoing demand.
Confirms:Revenue guidance for Q4 is confirmed to be within the range of $1.91B to $2.05B.
Disproves:Guidance is below $1.91B. This shows weaker demand expectations.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for COHR yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 6, 2026, Coherent Corp. (the “Company”) issued a press release reporting its financial results for the third quarter of fiscal year 2026 ended March 31, 2026. A copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference. The information in
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$230.00 – $455.00 (median $330.00) · 7 analysts · as of 2026-05-07
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2, 2026-Q3
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Electronic Components.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
COHR Coherent Corp. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 30 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
APH Amphenol | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 66 of 100 | full | moderate |
GLW Corning Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 38 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
LFUS Littelfuse | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 99 of 100 | full | moderate |
VSH Vishay Intertechnology | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 37 of 100 | fair | elevated |
5 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 64% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=1040).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Met or beat guidance 88% of the last 8 guided quarters · 6.1% avg surprise
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Rapidly expand capacity to meet demand in AI datacenter infrastructure.
Focus on maintaining gross margin within the guided range.
Focus on achieving significant revenue growth across segments.
Align tax rate expectations with non-GAAP guidance to optimize financial outcomes.
Why it matters: EPS guidance shows profitability. It can affect how investors feel. Strong EPS guidance shows confidence in earnings.
Confirms:EPS guidance for Q4 is confirmed to be between $1.52 and $1.72.
Disproves:EPS guidance is below $1.52. This signals weaker earnings potential.
Why it matters: Better revenue growth helps management focus on growth. It shows the company is recovering.
Confirms:Q3 revenue growth exceeds 5% year over year.
Disproves:Q3 revenue growth remains below 0% year over year.
Why it matters: The earnings report will reveal if the company can recover from the recent earnings miss.
Confirms one read:Earnings report shows a profit and revenue growth.
Confirms the other:Earnings report shows another loss and declining revenue.
Why it matters: Maintaining this margin range is key to profitability. It shows the company's ability to manage costs amid growth.
Confirms:Gross margin percentage for Q4 is confirmed to be in the range of 39% to 41%.
Disproves:Gross margin is below 39%. This points to possible cost problems.
Why it matters: Keeping expenses low is key. It helps maintain profits as revenue grows.
Confirms:Operating costs for Q4 are between $360 million and $380 million.
Disproves:Operating costs are above $380 million. This shows there are problems.
Chief Strategy Officer — Giovanni Barbarossa: Giovanni Barbarossa is transitioning to a Special Advisor role before retiring.
Regulation FD Disclosure. The Company’s press release, dated March 2, 2026, announcing the private placement contemplated by the Purchase Agreement and a collaboration between Coherent and NVIDIA under which NVIDIA has access to five additional Coherent product families related to co-packaged optics, enabling next-generation AI infrastructure is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K. The information in
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities. On March 2, 2026, Coherent Corp. (“Coherent” or the “Company”) entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with NVIDIA Corporation (“NVIDIA”), and Coherent completed the issuance and sale of 7,788,161 shares of the Company’s common stock, no par value (the “Shares”), pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, at a price of $256.80 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $2 billion in cash. The Shares were issued and sold to NV…
of this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1 furnished pursuant to Item 9.01, shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that Section. Furthermore, the information in this