Reading CAVA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track CAVA free→Reading CAVA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track CAVA free→NYSEConsumer DiscretionaryRestaurantsSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, and earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Management's recent track record has been steady, but risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 464% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is rich, as it trades above peer multiples, and the longer horizon does not make that back through growth. Key factors to watch include guidance changes and sector trends, particularly how bellwethers like MCD, SBUX, and YUM perform. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 5 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $90.99. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $91, CAVA's earnings are too small for P/E to mean much; on sales it trades at 10× p/s (10.7× the 1× p/s peer median, and 1.2× even its own history). That gap is an optionality premium a financial-multiple model can't price — our $16 fair value covers only the as-is business, low confidence. Analysts: $69–$133. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 465% of near-term growth above a flat-multiple fair value; not enough history to forecast a comparison. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only expensive valuation — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated strong grew net income 70% of the time over the next year (vs 53% for the rest of the cohort, n=2844).
Over the trailing year it converted 2.81x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated robust grew net income 65% of the time over the next year (vs 49% for the rest of the cohort, n=2427).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.17 → $0.19 (+10.8% / 30d). 11 raised, 1 cut, 16 covering analysts.
2 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 12 maintained. 59% of analysts rate Buy.
12 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 18.9% above current price.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
Market and fundamentals agree. Analysts are positioned bullishly on a fundamentally strong name.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$241.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$497.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $5,265.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: This shows fewer customers and less sales. This could hurt overall growth.
Confirms:Same restaurant sales growth reported below 4.5% in the next earnings release.
Disproves:Same restaurant sales growth reported above 6.5% in the next earnings release.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for CAVA yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On May 19, 2026 , CAVA Group, Inc. (the "Company") issued a press release announcing earnings and other financial results for the fiscal quarter ended April 19, 2026. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference. The information in this Item 2.02, including the corresponding Exhibit 99.1, is being furnished and shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange A…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$69.00 – $133.00 (median $92.00) · 21 analysts · as of 2026-06-10
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2024-Q2, 2024-Q3, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Restaurants.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
CAVA Cava Group | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 79 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
MCD McDonald's | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 91 of 100 | full | moderate |
SBUX Starbucks | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 37 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
YUM Yum! Brands | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 77 of 100 | full | moderate |
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 56 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
1 material management or governance event in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated stable grew net income 55% of the time over the next year (vs 56% for the rest of the cohort, n=483).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLY
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Continue expanding CAVA restaurant locations with new market entries.
Focus on increasing same restaurant sales through guest traffic growth.
Aim to maintain restaurant-level profit margin despite increased costs.
Why it matters: Earnings results will show how well Cava Group is performing. It will help investors understand growth trends.
Confirms one read:Earnings report shows revenue growth above 10% year over year.
Confirms the other:Earnings report shows revenue growth below 5% year over year.
Why it matters: Fewer openings may show problems with growth plans. This can affect future growth.
Confirms:Net new restaurant openings below 75 in the next earnings report.
Disproves:Net new restaurant openings above 77 in the next earnings report.
Why it matters: Changes in leadership can affect company plans and results. Investors must know the new direction.
Confirms one read:New leaders have strong experience in the industry. This can help the company.
Confirms the other:There are no new leaders. The leadership stays the same.
Why it matters: A lower profit margin may mean higher costs or problems. This can hurt profits.
Confirms:Restaurant profit margin below 23.7% in the next earnings report.
Disproves:Restaurant profit margin above 24.3% in the next earnings report.
Why it matters: A drop in revenue growth could signal a change in the growth phase of the sector.
Confirms:Cava's revenue growth drops below the median growth rate of the last two years.
Disproves:Cava's revenue growth remains above the median growth rate.
Director — Karen Kochevar: Karen Kochevar is retiring from the Board upon the expiration of her current term.