Reading BX? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track BX free→Reading BX? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track BX free→
NYSEFinancialsAsset ManagementSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is also neutral. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, with BX compared to sector peers being below typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 41% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is expensive, growth-justified, as it is rich on today's multiple, but the three-year horizon reads cheaper once expected earnings growth is included. Key factors to watch include potential guidance cuts and the performance of sector bellwethers, which could impact BX's outlook. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $122.79. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $123 the market pays 21× p/e — above the 15× p/e peer median but in line with its own 27× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $87 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with low confidence. Analysts: $130–$184. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 41% of near-term growth above a flat-multiple fair value; not enough history to forecast a comparison. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Flags: expensive valuation, a turbulent sector regime (Heating).
For similar setups historically (n=2,301): about 43% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 77% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=4936).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.49x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=4725).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
Not enough signal yet.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.44 → $1.36 (-5.9% / 30d). 1 raised, 12 cut, 16 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 59% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 1 guided quarters · 26.7% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$159.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$393.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $4,477.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: High Fee Related Earnings show that operations are doing well.
Confirms:Fee Related Earnings reported above $1.5 billion in Q2.
Disproves:Fee Related Earnings reported below $1.3 billion in Q2.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for BX yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On April 23, 2026, Blackstone Inc. issued a press release and detailed presentation announcing financial results for its first quarter ended March 31, 2026. The press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1. All information in the press release is furnished but not filed.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$130.00 – $184.00 (median $156.00) · 7 analysts · as of 2026-04-27
Looks more expensive than peers.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Asset Management & Custody Banks.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
BX Blackstone Inc. | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 23 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
BLK BlackRock | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 65 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
BNY BNY Mellon | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 62 of 100 | expensive | low |
BK BNY Mellon | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 100 of 100 | inexpensive | high |
KKR KKR & Co. | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 25 of 100 | full | elevated |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on enhancing realized performance revenues across investment strategies.
Continue to sustain and grow Fee Related Earnings across the business.
Focus on increasing total and fee-earning assets under management.
Why it matters: Slower AUM growth could signal challenges in attracting new capital.
Confirms:Total AUM growth is below 10% compared to last year.
Disproves:Total AUM growth is above 12% compared to last year.
Why it matters: Higher performance revenues would help Blackstone grow. It would also help with profits.
Confirms:Realized performance revenues increase by more than 20% in Q2.
Disproves:Realized performance revenues increase by less than 10% in Q2.
Why it matters: Strong inflows would show that Blackstone is growing. It would also show investor trust.
Confirms:Q2 inflows reported above $70 billion.
Disproves:Q2 inflows reported below $60 billion.
Why it matters: Earnings results will show how well Blackstone is managing its priorities.
Confirms one read:The Q2 earnings report shows strong results. They are better than what analysts expected.
Confirms the other:The Q2 earnings report shows weak results. They are below what analysts expected.
Why it matters: Revenue growth is a key driver for the sector. A drop signals a slowdown.
Confirms:Blackstone's revenue growth drops below 12% year over year.
Disproves:Revenue growth stays at or above 12% year over year.