Reading BRO? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track BRO free→Reading BRO? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track BRO free→NYSEFinancialsInsurance BrokersSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes. Earnings quality is mixed, and risk is elevated, while the sector backdrop is a headwind. Compared with sector peers, BRO is above typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 6% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $59.99. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $60 BRO trades at 14× p/e, below its 15× p/e peer median. Our $64 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 7% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 26%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated strong grew net income 67% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=3733).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.30x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=4725).
Not enough signal yet.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the broad stock market, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, the US dollar, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates.
3 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Financials names rated volatile grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=3774).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.08 → $1.08 (-0.2% / 30d). 3 raised, 11 cut, 17 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 2 maintained. 26% of analysts rate Buy.
0 positive, 1 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
Divergence: fundamentals are strong but estimates are being cut. Worth reading the recent material events.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$131.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$278.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $5,070.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A drop in revenue growth could signal a slowdown in the financial sector.
Confirms:Revenue growth reported below 10% year over year.
Disproves:Revenue growth remains above 12% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Advances: Increase Organic Revenue with Contingents
New leader enhances growth potential in transaction tax services.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On June 5, 2026, Brown & Brown, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into an amended and restated credit agreement (the “Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”) with the lenders named therein, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as administrative agent, Bank of America, N.A., Truist Bank and BMO Bank N.A. as co-syndication agents, and U.S. Bank National Association, Fifth Third Bank, National Association, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, PNC Bank, Nation…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Insurance Brokers.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
BRO Brown & Brown | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 88 of 100 | fair | elevated |
MRSH Marsh McLennan | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 74 of 100 | full | moderate |
AON Aon plc | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 70 of 100 | full | moderate |
AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 72 of 100 | full | moderate |
WTW Willis Towers Watson | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 34 of 100 | fair | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 1 guided quarters · 0.0% avg surprise
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on growing Organic Revenue with Contingents by leveraging existing customer relationships.
Continue to focus on maintaining a strong EBITDAC Margin - Adjusted through operational efficiencies.
Aim to enhance Diluted Net Income Per Share - Adjusted through strategic initiatives and cost management.
Why it matters: Changes in leadership can affect company plans and results.
Confirms one read:Announcement of a new executive with a strong track record in the industry.
Confirms the other:No new leadership announcements have been made. Leadership roles are still unstable.
Why it matters: Earnings results will show if the company can maintain growth amid sector headwinds.
Confirms one read:Earnings per share are over $0.50. This shows strong performance.
Confirms the other:Earnings per share fall below $0.40, suggesting weaker results.
Why it matters: A better metric means more customers stay and sales improve. This is important for growth.
Confirms:Organic Revenue with Contingents growth exceeds 2.2% in the next quarter.
Disproves:Organic Revenue with Contingents growth remains at or below 2.2%.
Advances: Increase Organic Revenue with Contingents
New leader enhances growth potential in transaction tax services.
SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized. BROWN & BROWN, INC. (Registrant) Date: June 5, 2026 By: /s/ Anthony M. Robinson Anthony M. Robinson Secretary
of this Current Report, including Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed to be filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section. The information in this current report shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
The filing pertains to an amendment of the stock incentive plan, not a management change.