Reading BIIB? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track BIIB free→Reading BIIB? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track BIIB free→
NASDAQHealth CareDrug Manufacturers - GeneralSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes. Earnings quality is mixed, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, which adds to the moderate risk profile. Peer multiples imply a price about 20% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair. The outlook hinges on whether BIIB cuts guidance on the next call, which could negatively impact estimates. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $200.05. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $200 BIIB trades at 13× p/e, below its 16× p/e peer median. Our $251 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Analysts: $185–$260. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 20% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 0%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Health Care names rated strong grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 52% for the rest of the cohort, n=2344).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.89x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Health Care names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 50% for the rest of the cohort, n=2269).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $2.02 → $1.94 (-4.0% / 30d). 0 raised, 9 cut, 20 covering analysts.
1 upgrade, 0 downgrades / 30d, 2 maintained. 57% of analysts rate Buy.
3 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 21.9% above current price.
1 positive, 1 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$149.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$281.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,434.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A drop would show problems in making money from multiple sclerosis products.
Confirms:Q2 2026 total revenue declines by more than mid-single digits compared to Q1 2026.
Disproves:Q2 2026 total revenue remains flat or grows compared to Q1 2026.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for BIIB yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Completion of Acquisition or Disposition of Assets. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, on April 14, 2026, Purchaser commenced a tender offer (the “Offer”) to acquire any and all of the issued and outstanding Shares, in exchange for (i) $41.00 per Share, net to the seller in cash, without interest and subject to reduction for any applicable tax withholding (the “Cash Amount”), plus (ii) one contractual, non-transferable contingent value right per Share (each, a “CVR”) representing the right to…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$185.00 – $260.00 (median $222.00) · 11 analysts · as of 2026-06-08
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Biotechnology.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
BIIB Biogen | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 89 of 100 | fair | moderate |
ABBV AbbVie | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 79 of 100 | full | low |
AMGN Amgen | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 75 of 100 | full | moderate |
GILD Gilead Sciences | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 96 of 100 | fair | moderate |
VRTX Vertex Pharmaceuticals | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 82 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
14 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Health Care names rated volatile grew net income 43% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=600).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLV
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 1 guided quarters · 57.9% avg surprise
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Biogen aims to manage a mid-single digit percentage decline in total revenue for 2026 compared to 2025.
Biogen continues to focus on investment for growth, including business development and pipeline expansion.
Biogen completed the acquisition of Apellis Pharmaceuticals to strengthen its portfolio.
Biogen is managing a projected mid-single digit revenue decline for 2026 compared to 2025.
Why it matters: FDA approval would boost Biogen's revenue from LEQEMBI, a key growth product.
Confirms:FDA grants approval for LEQEMBI IQLIK by the PDUFA date of May 24, 2026.
Disproves:FDA denies approval or delays the decision past the PDUFA date.
Why it matters: A good merger could improve Biogen's products and its place in the market.
Confirms one read:Biogen shares good news about the merger with Apellis and says it is going well.
Confirms the other:Biogen reports delays or problems with the merger with Apellis.
Why it matters: Good results could support Biogen's plans and help it grow.
Confirms:Results from the litifilimab Phase 3 studies for lupus will come in Q4 2026.
Disproves:Results show bad outcomes or big delays.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. CVR Agreement As previously disclosed, on March 31, 2026, Biogen Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Biogen”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Apellis”), and Aspen Purchaser Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Biogen (“Purchaser”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement and in connection with the irrevocable acceptance for payment b…
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement. The information set forth in
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On April 29, 2026, Biogen Inc. issued a press release announcing its results of operations and financial condition for the first quarter ended March 31, 2026. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference. The press release is being furnished pursuant to
Results of Operations and Financial Condition Biogen Inc. (Biogen) expects that its GAAP and non-GAAP results for the first quarter of 2026 will include acquired in-process research and development, upfront and milestone expense of approximately $34 million on a pre-tax basis. The estimated charge is expected to impact GAAP and non-GAAP net income per diluted share for the first quarter of 2026 by approximately $0.19 per share. Acquired in-process research and development, upfront and milesto…