Reading BALL? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track BALL free→Reading BALL? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track BALL free→
NYSEMaterialsPackaging & ContainersSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but earnings quality is fragile, indicating that reported profits may not be well-supported by cash flow. Management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive changes. The sector backdrop is a headwind, which could impact future performance. Peer multiples imply a price about 34% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, value-trap risk, as it trades below peer multiples while earnings quality is fragile. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $56.98. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $57 BALL trades at 16× p/e, below its 25× p/e peer median. Our $86 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 34% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 5%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack. Regime (Crisis) does not concentrate fragility.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Materials names rated strong grew net income 63% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=1093).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.22x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Materials names rated fragile grew net income 46% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=988).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.00 → $0.98 (-2.0% / 30d). 3 raised, 11 cut, 14 covering analysts.
1 upgrade, 0 downgrades / 30d, 0 maintained. 81% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$93.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$249.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,211.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Completing the tender offers is key for Ball's debt management and financial health. It shows how well they can handle their obligations.
Confirms:All conditions for the tender offers are satisfied, and payment is made on March 15, 2024.
Disproves:Tender offers are delayed or not completed due to unmet conditions.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for BALL yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On May 5, 2026, Ball Corporation (“Ball") issued a press release and will hold a conference call regarding its financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2026. The release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 8-K. The Company’s results and earnings information regarding its first quarter, as well as information regarding the use of non-U.S. GAAP financial measures, are set forth in the attached press release dated May 5, 2026…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Materials (broad).
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
BALL Ball Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 88 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
LIN Linde plc | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 67 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
NEM Newmont | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 94 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
FCX Freeport-McMoRan | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 51 of 100 | full | elevated |
SHW Sherwin-Williams | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 71 of 100 | full | moderate |
14 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Materials names rated volatile grew net income 61% of the time over the next year (vs 51% for the rest of the cohort, n=235).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLB
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Ball Corporation aims for a 10-plus percent growth in comparable diluted earnings per share in 2026.
Ball Corporation aims to generate free cash flow greater than $900 million in 2026.
Ball Corporation is undergoing a leadership transition with the appointment of a new CEO.
Why it matters: The success of these offers shows how well Ball can manage its debt. It reflects the company's financial health.
Confirms:At least 90% of the 2025 and 2026 Notes are successfully tendered and accepted.
Disproves:Less than 70% of the 2025 and 2026 Notes are tendered and accepted.
Why it matters: The results will show how much debt Ball Corporation has reduced. This impacts financial health.
Confirms:Ball finishes the tender offers for at least $1.5 billion in total notes.
Disproves:Ball fails to complete the tender offers or accepts less than $1 billion in notes.
Why it matters: This growth rate shows strong performance and confidence from investors.
Confirms:Ball reports EPS growth exceeding 10% in its Q2 earnings release.
Disproves:EPS growth reported below 5% in the Q2 earnings release.
Why it matters: Generating strong free cash flow is crucial for Ball's capital allocation and growth plans.
Confirms:Free cash flow reported exceeds $900 million in the next financial report.
Disproves:Free cash flow reported is below $900 million.
Why it matters: Leadership changes can change company strategy and performance. Watching this shows how well the change is handled.
Confirms one read:A good market reaction or better numbers can show success with the new CEO.
Confirms the other:A bad market reaction or worse numbers can show problems with the new CEO.
Why it matters: Earnings results will show if Ball is on track for its goal of over 10% EPS growth.
Confirms:Earnings per share growth exceeds 10% year over year.
Disproves:EPS growth is below 10% year over year.
Why it matters: News about the new CEO's plan can change how investors feel and guide the company.
Confirms one read:Ball announces a clear strategic vision from the new CEO that excites investors.
Confirms the other:The new CEO's strategy fails to address key investor concerns or lacks clarity.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On February 3, 2026, Ball Corporation (“Ball") issued a press release and will hold a conference call regarding its financial results for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2025. The release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 8-K. The Company’s results and earnings information regarding its fourth quarter, as well as information regarding the use of non-U.S. GAAP financial measures, are set forth in the attached press release dated F…
Chief Supply Chain and Operations Officer — Scott Vail: The company hired an experienced executive from outside to lead a key function.
Director — Mr. Fisher: Mr. Fisher resigned from his role and the company provided severance benefits.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On November 25, 2025, Ball Corporation, an Indiana corporation (“ Ball ”), entered into a Sixth Amendment to Credit Agreement (the “ Sixth Amendment ”), among Ball, as a borrower and guarantor, certain subsidiaries of Ball party thereto as borrowers and as guarantors, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and as collateral agent, the lenders party thereto, and the initial issuing banks party thereto, which amends Ball’s existing stock secur…