Reading BAH? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track BAH free→Reading BAH? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track BAH free→
NYSEIndustrialsConsulting ServicesSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but earnings quality and management's track record are neutral. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, which may impact future performance. Peer multiples imply a price about 54% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, quality intact. Key factors to watch include guidance changes and sector trends, as these could significantly influence BAH's outlook. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $77.41. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $77 BAH trades at 11× p/e, below its 23× p/e peer median. Our $173 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $80–$110. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 55% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about -3%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Industrials names rated strong grew net income 69% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=3696).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.22x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=4440).
Not enough signal yet.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the broad stock market, the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
2 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=1113).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.51 → $1.50 (-0.8% / 30d). 4 raised, 3 cut, 12 covering analysts.
1 upgrade, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 20% of analysts rate Buy.
3 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 14.9% above current price.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$153.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$401.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,707.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Earnings will show if Booz Allen meets its revenue and EPS targets for the year.
Confirms one read:Revenue of $11.2 billion or more and adjusted EPS of $6.00 or higher.
Confirms the other:Revenue below $11.2 billion and adjusted EPS below $6.00.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for BAH yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
and Exhibit 99.1 shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in that filing.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$80.00 – $110.00 (median $84.00) · 4 analysts · as of 2026-05-27
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2, 2026-Q3
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Research & Consulting Services.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
BAH Booz Allen Hamilton | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 96 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
VRSK Verisk Analytics | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 81 of 100 | fair | elevated |
EFX Equifax | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 87 of 100 | fair | elevated |
TRU TransUnion | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 93 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
FCN FTI Consulting | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 67 of 100 | fair | elevated |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLI
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Target revenue between $11.2 billion and $11.7 billion for fiscal year 2027.
Target free cash flow between $825 million and $925 million for fiscal year 2027.
Target adjusted diluted EPS between $6.00 and $6.35 for fiscal year 2027.
Why it matters: Troy Lahr's first report will show how he plans to manage finances. Investors will look for signs of stability after the CEO transition.
Confirms one read:The earnings report shows better financial numbers than last year.
Confirms the other:The earnings report shows a decline in key financial metrics compared to the previous year.
Why it matters: Updates on free cash flow show how strong the finances are. They also show the ability to invest.
Confirms:Free cash flow guidance raised above $925 million for fiscal year 2027.
Disproves:Free cash flow guidance lowered below $825 million for fiscal year 2027.
Why it matters: The industrial sector is slowing. Changes in performance could impact Booz Allen's growth outlook.
Confirms:The industrial sector shows revenue growth speeding up above 10%.
Disproves:The industrial sector keeps showing growth that is falling below 5%.
Why it matters: Increasing the board size may bring new perspectives. This could impact strategic direction and investor confidence.
Confirms one read:The new board member's experience aligns with Booz Allen's strategic goals.
Confirms the other:The new board member lacks relevant experience or creates conflict within the board.
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) — Troy Lahr: Appointment of a new Chief Financial Officer from an external candidate.
Director — Ryan Nolan: Appointment of a new director to the Board.