Reading AOS? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track AOS free→Reading AOS? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track AOS free→NYSEIndustrialsSpecialty Industrial MachinerySnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is also neutral. Management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, which may impact performance compared to sector peers, where it is typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 12% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $59.08. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $59 AOS trades at 16× p/e, below its 18× p/e peer median. Our $68 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Analysts: $67–$80. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 13% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 1%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 0 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 64% for the rest of the cohort, n=4882).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.34x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=4440).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.94 → $0.94 (-0.3% / 30d). 0 raised, 12 cut, 12 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 1 downgrade / 30d, 1 maintained. 38% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 26.6% above current price.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$116.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$254.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,068.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: The earnings report will show if A. O. Smith meets its EPS target of $3.85 to $4.15 for 2026. This is key for investor confidence.
Confirms:Q2 2026 diluted EPS reported at or above $3.85.
Disproves:Q2 2026 diluted EPS reported below $3.70.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Threatens: Manage challenging conditions in China
China headwinds impact management's objective to manage conditions.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Chief Financial Officer — Charles T. Lauber: Charles T. Lauber is retiring and being succeeded by Carrie Anderson as CFO.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$67.00 – $80.00 (median $75.00) · 7 analysts · as of 2026-06-10
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Building Products.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
AOS A. O. Smith | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 64 of 100 | fair | moderate |
TT Trane Technologies | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 45 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
JCI Johnson Controls | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 45 of 100 | expensive | low |
CARR Carrier Global | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 24 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
LII Lennox International | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 63 of 100 | full | moderate |
6 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Industrials names rated volatile grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 59% for the rest of the cohort, n=840).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLI
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
A. O. Smith aims to increase its consolidated sales by 2% to 5% in 2026 compared to 2025.
Not yet measured, building a track record across disclosures.
A. O. Smith is focused on managing the challenging market conditions in China, which have impacted sales.
Not yet measured, building a track record across disclosures.
A. O. Smith has lowered its full-year 2026 EPS outlook due to continued challenging conditions.
Why it matters: This report will show if the company meets its sales growth target of 2% to 5%.
Confirms one read:Q2 2026 earnings show sales growth of at least 2% year over year.
Confirms the other:Q2 2026 earnings show sales growth below 2% year over year.
Why it matters: Improvement in the China market is crucial for A. O. Smith's growth. It will impact overall sales and margins.
Confirms:China sales show a year-over-year increase of at least 5% in Q2 2026.
Disproves:China sales fell more in Q2 2026 than last year.
Why it matters: Closing this acquisition is key for expanding A. O. Smith's water management capabilities. It could enhance future growth.
Confirms:The company announced that it has finished buying Leonard Valve.
Disproves:Acquisition fails to close by the end of Q2 2026.
Why it matters: Changes in EPS guidance show how management sees profits and market conditions.
Confirms one read:Management raises EPS guidance to more than $4.15.
Confirms the other:Management lowers EPS guidance to less than $3.85.
Why it matters: This acquisition could boost growth in the water management market.
Confirms:Leonard Valve contributes at least $70 million in sales in 2026.
Disproves:Leonard Valve does not bring in expected sales or hurts profits.
Why it matters: Sales growth in North America is crucial for A. O. Smith's overall performance. It indicates market demand and pricing power.
Confirms one read:North America sales grow year-over-year by at least 3% in Q2 2026.
Confirms the other:North America sales fell in Q2 2026 compared to last year.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On April 30, 2026, A. O. Smith Corporation (“the Company”) issued a news release announcing the Company’s results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. A copy of the Company’s news release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K (this “Current Report”) and is incorporated by reference herein.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On January 29, 2026, A. O. Smith Corporation (“the Company”) issued a news release announcing the Company’s results for the year ended December 31, 2025. A copy of the Company’s news release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K (this “Current Report”) and is incorporated by reference herein.
Other Events. On November 12, 2025, the Company disclosed that it had signed a definitive agreement to acquire Leonard Valve. Leonard Valve, together with its Heat-Timer brand, is a leading designer and manufacturer of thermostatic and digital mixing valves and temperature control solutions used in commercial and institutional applications. On January 6, 2026, the Company consummated the acquisition of Leonard Valve. A copy of the Company's news release relating to the consummation is attache…
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant. On January 5, 2026, A. O. Smith Corporation (the “Company”) entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) among the Company, the various lenders party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent (the “Agent”). The Credit Agreement provided for an unsecured term loan in the amount of $470 million that matures on January 5, 2029. The Company borrowed the…