Reading AMR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track AMR free→Reading AMR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track AMR free→
NYSEMaterialsCoking CoalSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak, and earnings quality cannot be assessed since the company was unprofitable over the past year. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, with AMR trading below typical compared to sector peers. Peer multiples imply a price about 41% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is rich, as it trades above peer multiples, and the longer horizon does not make that back through growth. Key factors to watch include any guidance cuts from AMR and the performance of sector bellwethers like HCC, METC, and SXC. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 3 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $200.82. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $201 AMR trades at 1× p/s, in line with its 1× p/s peer median. Our $145 fair value reflects that, medium confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 38% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about -17%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
TTM earnings are negative, so the read leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods rather than P/E. This is a data condition, not a forward call.
No fragility gates fired. Regime (Crisis) does not concentrate fragility.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Materials names rated weak grew net income 51% of the time over the next year (vs 59% for the rest of the cohort, n=1088).
Over the trailing year it converted -3.92x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
Not enough signal yet.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $3.90 → $1.57 (-59.7% / 30d). 0 raised, 1 cut, 1 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 0% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 1 guided quarters · 0.0% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$224.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$615.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,485.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Valuation label changed from 'full' to 'expensive'.
As of June 12, 2026, the valuation dimension changed and became expensive. The risk dimension remained elevated. The sector backdrop is facing headwinds. The recent financial performance is described as weak.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: More cash from operations shows better cash flow. This can help with future investments.
Confirms:Cash from operations grew year over year, reaching over $29.046M.
Disproves:Cash from operations decreases or stays below $29.046M.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for AMR yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 8, 2026, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing earnings and other financial results for its fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2026. The press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Looks more expensive than peers.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Steel.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
AMR Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 21 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
NUE Nucor | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 59 of 100 | fair | moderate |
STLD Steel Dynamics | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 58 of 100 | full | moderate |
RS Reliance, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 76 of 100 | full | moderate |
CMC Commercial Metals | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 32 of 100 | fair | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLB
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Alpha aims to maintain its cost of coal sales guidance despite higher costs due to external factors.
Alpha focuses on increasing cash from operations to strengthen its financial position.
Alpha aims to stabilize its revenue amidst fluctuating market conditions.
Focus on improving operating income through cost management and operational efficiency.
Why it matters: Better Adjusted EBITDA means the company is running well and keeping costs down.
Confirms:Q2 Adjusted EBITDA is over $30 million. This shows gains in operations.
Disproves:Q2 Adjusted EBITDA is below $30 million. This shows ongoing challenges.
Why it matters: Stable revenue shows the company is handling challenges. This can help how the market sees it.
Confirms one read:Q2 revenue stabilizes or grows year over year, showing improvement from $524.987M.
Confirms the other:Q2 revenue continues to decline year over year below $524.987M.
Why it matters: Better operating income means cost management is working. This can help investor trust.
Confirms:Q2 operating income is better than last year. Losses decreased from -$10.432M.
Disproves:Q2 operating income worsens or remains at -$10.432M or worse.
Why it matters: Changes in coal sales prices affect revenue and profits. Investors watch these price trends closely.
Confirms one read:Coal sales realization pricing increases above $128.40 per ton in Q2.
Confirms the other:Coal sales realization pricing drops below $124.39 per ton in Q2.
Why it matters: Shipment volumes show how much people want the product. Investors want stability or growth.
Confirms:Q2 coal shipment volumes exceed 3.6 million tons.
Disproves:Q2 coal shipment volumes fall below 3.6 million tons.
Why it matters: If the materials sector shows revenue growth, it may help Alpha Metallurgical's performance. This could signal a recovery.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth picks up above 1% year over year.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth remains below 1% year over year.
Why it matters: Changes in cost guidance will show how well Alpha manages rising supply costs. Investors watch for cost control.
Confirms:Management maintains or lowers cost of coal sales guidance for 2026.
Disproves:Management raises the cost guidance for coal sales. This is due to supply cost pressures.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On April 24, 2026, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing certain preliminary financial results for its fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2026. The press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1. This Current Report on Form 8-K and the earnings press release attached hereto are being furnished by the Registrant pursuant to Item 2.02 “Results of Operations and Financial Condition.” In accordance with G…