Reading AKAM? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track AKAM free→Reading AKAM? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track AKAM free→NASDAQInformation TechnologySoftware - InfrastructureSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral. Earnings quality is robust, cash backs up profits. Management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent changes. Risk is elevated, but the sector backdrop is a tailwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 36% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, quality intact. If AKAM cuts guidance on the next call, that could be negative.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $133.50. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $134 AKAM trades at 19× p/e, below its 31× p/e peer median. Our $210 fair value sits above the price; medium confidence. Analysts: $76–$195. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 36% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 7%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 68% for the rest of the cohort, n=3704).
Over the trailing year it converted 3.63x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated robust grew net income 69% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=2129).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.59 → $1.58 (-0.5% / 30d). 0 raised, 18 cut, 22 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 56% of analysts rate Buy.
2 positive, 3 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$193.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$375.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,544.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A slowdown in revenue growth may show problems in Akamai's growth plan. This is true for Cloud Infrastructure Services.
Confirms:Q1 2026 revenue growth was less than 5% compared to last year.
Disproves:Q1 2026 revenue growth above 5% year-over-year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Advances: Expand Cloud Infrastructure Services
Partnership enhances cloud infrastructure services and security.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement Convertible Note Offering On May 22, 2026, Akamai Technologies, Inc. (“Akamai”) completed its previously announced offering of 0.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2030 (the “2030 Notes”) and 0.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2032 (the “2032 Notes” and, together with the 2030 Notes, the “Notes”). The Notes were sold in a private placement under a purchase agreement, dated as of May 19, 2026, entered into by and between Akamai and each of J.P. Morgan S…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$76.00 – $195.00 (median $130.00) · 22 analysts · as of 2026-05-14
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Information Technology (broad).
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
AKAM Akamai Technologies | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 43 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 88 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
AAPL Apple Inc | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 74 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
MSFT Microsoft | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 82 of 100 | full | moderate |
AVGO Broadcom | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 75 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
15 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Information Technology names rated volatile grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=793).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Met or beat guidance 80% of the last 5 guided quarters · 11.6% avg surprise
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Akamai aims to expand its Cloud Infrastructure Services, focusing on AI and edge computing.
Akamai is focused on achieving consistent revenue growth across its business segments.
Akamai aims to maintain its non-GAAP operating margin within the guided range.
Manage the transition of the CEO role to ensure continuity and strategic alignment.
Why it matters: A drop in operating margin may show rising costs or inefficiencies. This can hurt overall profits.
Confirms:Non-GAAP operating margin was below 26% for Q1 2026.
Disproves:Non-GAAP operating margin at or above 26% for Q1 2026.
Why it matters: A drop in growth for Cloud Infrastructure Services may show less demand for Akamai's new products.
Confirms:Cloud Infrastructure Services revenue growth was less than 36% compared to last year.
Disproves:Cloud Infrastructure Services revenue growth was 36% or more compared to last year.
Why it matters: News about share buybacks can show management's trust in the company's worth and future.
Confirms:They announced the share buyback is done or will happen faster.
Disproves:No updates on share buybacks or a pause in the program.
Why it matters: Strong revenue from this new service would support growth and validate the AI strategy.
Confirms:Revenue from Akamai Inference Cloud exceeds $50 million in the first quarter.
Disproves:Revenue from Akamai Inference Cloud falls below $20 million in the first quarter.
Advances: Expand Cloud Infrastructure Services
Partnership enhances cloud infrastructure services and security.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On May 18, 2026, Akamai Technologies, Inc. (“Akamai”) entered into an Amendment No. 3 (the “Third Amendment”), by and among Akamai, the financial institutions identified therein as lenders and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent (the “Agent”), which amends that certain Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”), dated November 22, 2022 (as amended on April 17, 2025 and May 12, 2025), by and among Akamai, the financial institutions part…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On May 7, 2026, Akamai Technologies, Inc. announced its financial results for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2026. The full text of the press release issued in connection with the announcement is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K. The information provided under this Form 8-K (including Exhibit 99.1) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") or o…
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant. The information set forth in
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities. The Notes were sold to the Initial Purchasers in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act for resale to persons reasonably believed to be qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A of the Securities Act. Akamai does not intend to file a shelf registration statement for the resale of the Notes or any common stock issuable upon conversion of the Notes. The warrants were sold…