Reading AIZ? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track AIZ free→Reading AIZ? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track AIZ free→
NYSEFinancialsInsurance - Property & CasualtySnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Management's recent track record has been volatile, and it has a capital-unfriendly stance. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, while compared with sector peers, AIZ is above typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 14% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $260.99. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $261 AIZ trades at 12× p/e, below its 15× p/e peer median. Our $303 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Analysts: $246–$290. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 14% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 12%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=4936).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.68x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated robust grew net income 62% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=3541).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity, the US dollar.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $5.25 → $5.16 (-1.7% / 30d). 3 raised, 3 cut, 7 covering analysts.
1 upgrade, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 100% of analysts rate Buy.
2 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 13.6% above current price.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
Transition story with positive analyst positioning (often a turnaround setup).
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$89.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$211.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,258.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: This shows slower growth for Global Lifestyle. This is important for overall performance.
Confirms:Q2 Adjusted EBITDA growth is reported below 6% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 Adjusted EBITDA growth exceeds 6% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for AIZ yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that Section 18, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as may be expressly set forth by specific reference in any such filing.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$246.00 – $290.00 (median $274.00) · 5 analysts · as of 2026-05-26
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Multi-line Insurance.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
AIZ Assurant | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 91 of 100 | fair | moderate |
AIG American International Group | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 70 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
L Loews Corporation | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 67 of 100 | fair | low |
AFG American Financial Group | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 37 of 100 | fair | moderate |
LNC Lincoln Financial | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 28 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
7 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Financials names rated volatile grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=3774).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on growing Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted earnings per share, excluding reportable catastrophes.
Drive growth in Global Lifestyle Adjusted EBITDA, focusing on Connected Living and Global Automotive.
Focus on sustaining EBITDA growth through strategic initiatives and operational efficiencies.
Aim to enhance adjusted earnings per share through operational improvements and strategic initiatives.
Focus on increasing EBITDA in the Global Housing segment through strategic growth and operational efficiencies.
Why it matters: Lower growth shows problems in keeping profits. This is true even after strong past performance.
Confirms:Q2 adjusted earnings per share growth reported below 9% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 adjusted earnings per share growth exceeds 9% year over year.
Why it matters: Going over this amount shows strong cash flow. It also shows management's confidence in growth.
Confirms:Share repurchases were above $350 million for 2026.
Disproves:Share repurchases were below $300 million for 2026.
Why it matters: Strong growth in Global Housing EBITDA shows the company is doing well in this area.
Confirms:Global Housing EBITDA increases by at least 15% compared to Q2 2025.
Disproves:Global Housing EBITDA growth is below 5% compared to Q2 2025.
The filing pertains to an amendment of the equity incentive plan, not a management change.
shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that Section 18, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as may be expressly set forth by specific reference in any such filing.
Director — Lynn Blake: Lynn Blake was appointed to the Board and certain committees.
shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that Section 18, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as may be expressly set forth by specific reference in any such filing.