Reading AES? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track AES free→Reading AES? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track AES free→NYSEUtilitiesUtilities - DiversifiedSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak, and management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes. Earnings quality is robust, and the company has a capital-friendly stance. The sector backdrop is a headwind, which may impact performance. Peer multiples imply a price about 72% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, value-trap risk, as it trades below peer multiples while recent financials are weak. If AES cuts guidance on the next call, that could be a meaningful negative. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 5 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $14.68. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $15 AES trades at 5× p/e, below its 20× p/e peer median. Our $53 fair value sits above the price; medium confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price sits about 72% below a flat-multiple fair value; not enough history to forecast a comparison. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Utilities names rated weak grew net income 53% of the time over the next year (vs 59% for the rest of the cohort, n=906).
Over the trailing year it converted 3.67x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Utilities names rated robust grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=832).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.49 → $0.51 (+5.6% / 30d). 0 raised, 0 cut, 2 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 9% of analysts rate Buy.
0 positive, 1 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$21.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$255.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,898.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Confirming guidance shows AES is confident about its financial health and growth.
Confirms:AES reaffirms 2025 Adjusted EBITDA guidance of $2,650 to $2,850 million.
Disproves:AES cuts its 2025 Adjusted EBITDA guidance to below $2,650 million.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for AES yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Other Events. As previously disclosed, on March 1, 2026, The AES Corporation (the “ Company ” or “ AES ”) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “ Merger Agreement ”) with Horizon Parent, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“ Parent ”), and Horizon Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (“ Merger Sub ”) , pursuant to which, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein, Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company (the “ M…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Utilities (broad).
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
AES AES Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 98 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
NEE NextEra Energy | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 66 of 100 | full | low |
SO Southern Company | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 68 of 100 | fair | low |
DUK Duke Energy | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 82 of 100 | fair | low |
CEG Constellation Energy | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 60 of 100 | full | elevated |
6 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Utilities names rated volatile grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=3774).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLU
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
AES aims to add 3.2 GW of new renewable energy projects to its operational portfolio by the end of 2025.
AES plans to sign 14-17 GW of Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) from 2023 to 2025.
AES reaffirms its 2025 Adjusted EBITDA guidance of $2,650 to $2,850 million.
Engage in negotiations for a new Power Purchase Agreement for the Maritza power plant in Bulgaria as the current PPA expires in May 2026.
Proceed with the divestiture as outlined in the Agreement and Plan of Merger with Horizon Parent, L.P.
Why it matters: Completing these projects will show AES's ability to grow its operational capacity. This is key for future revenue.
Confirms:AES completes the remaining 0.3 GW of projects by year-end 2025.
Disproves:AES fails to complete the 3.2 GW target by year-end 2025.
Why it matters: The outcome will impact AES's revenue and growth strategy in Indiana.
Confirms one read:AES Indiana gets a good decision on its rate review.
Confirms the other:AES Indiana gets a bad decision on its rate review.
Why it matters: Signing these PPAs shows AES's plan to grow in renewables. It will also bring steady income.
Confirms:AES signs between 14-17 GW of new PPAs by the end of 2025.
Disproves:AES signs less than 14 GW of new PPAs by the end of 2025.
Why it matters: This PPA is important for AES's growth and regulatory strategy. It signals market strength.
Confirms:AES successfully negotiates a new PPA for the Maritza plant.
Disproves:AES fails to negotiate a new PPA for the Maritza plant.
Vice President and Controller — Aubrey Jarred: Ms. Kohan transitioned to a new role within the company, and Ms. Jarred was appointed as Vice President and Controller.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. Following the announcement on March 2, 2026 that The AES Corporation (the “Company” or “AES”) had entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, by and among the Company, Horizon Parent, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“Parent”), and Horizon Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Parent, the Company entered into (i) Amendment No. 2 to the Credit Agreement (the “Citi Second Amendment”) on March 13, 2026, by and a…
President — Ricardo Falú: Ricardo Falú was promoted to President from his previous role as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On March 1, 2026, The AES Corporation (the “Company” or “AES”) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among the Company, Horizon Parent, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“Parent”), and Horizon Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein, Merger Sub will merge wit…