Reading ADSK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ADSK free→Reading ADSK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ADSK free→NASDAQInformation TechnologySoftware - ApplicationSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong. Earnings quality is neutral. Management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent changes. Risk is elevated, but the sector backdrop is a tailwind. Compared with sector peers, ADSK is above typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 5% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair. The three-year read shows peer multiples imply a price about 27% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis). ADSK's outlook hinges on guidance changes and sector trends. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $198.43. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $198 ADSK trades at 18× p/e, below its 21× p/e peer median. Our $190 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $262–$369. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 5% near-term growth, below our forecast of about 17%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated strong grew net income 73% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2777).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.90x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 62% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2831).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $3.04 → $3.12 (+2.5% / 30d). 21 raised, 2 cut, 25 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 10 maintained. 91% of analysts rate Buy.
5 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 33.4% above current price.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
Market and fundamentals agree. Analysts are positioned bullishly on a fundamentally strong name.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$159.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$408.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,928.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: If revenue is higher than expected, it shows strong business growth and momentum.
Confirms:Q2 revenue reported above $2,015 million.
Disproves:Q2 revenue reported below $2,005 million.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Advances: Optimize sales and marketing
Enhances sales and marketing through targeted digital platform.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 28, 2026, Autodesk, Inc. (“Autodesk” or the “Company”) issued a press release reporting financial results for the first fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2026. The press release is furnished herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference. The exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or incorporated by reference in any filing under…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$262.00 – $369.00 (median $305.00) · 11 analysts · as of 2026-05-29
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2, 2026-Q3, 2027-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Application Software.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
ADSK Autodesk | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 87 of 100 | full | elevated |
ORCL Oracle Corporation | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 65 of 100 | full | elevated |
PLTR Palantir Technologies | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 79 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
SAP SAP SE | — | — | elevated |
APP AppLovin | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 62 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
20 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Information Technology names rated volatile grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=793).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Autodesk plans to acquire MaintainX to advance its unified platform in operations.
Autodesk continues to optimize its sales and marketing to drive higher margins.
Autodesk aims to enhance its operating margin through strategic initiatives.
Autodesk aims to exceed its financial guidance through strong business performance.
Why it matters: Higher EPS shows that the company is making more money and managing costs well.
Confirms:Q2 GAAP EPS reported above $1.97.
Disproves:Q2 GAAP EPS reported below $1.84.
Why it matters: The success of the sales optimization plan will show if Autodesk can sustain growth.
Confirms one read:Billings growth exceeds 20% year over year.
Confirms the other:Billings growth falls below 10% year over year.
Why it matters: High billings growth means strong demand and good sales strategies.
Confirms:Billings growth reported above 30% year over year.
Disproves:Billings growth reported below 25% year over year.
Why it matters: Closing the MaintainX deal could enhance Autodesk's platform and long-term growth potential.
Confirms:The deal will close soon. It will be part of Autodesk's operations next quarter.
Disproves:The acquisition faces delays or fails to close as planned.
Why it matters: More free cash flow shows good efficiency and strong financial health.
Confirms:Free cash flow reported above $2,800 million.
Disproves:Free cash flow reported below $2,700 million.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On May 28, 2026, Autodesk, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Autodesk” or the “Company”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Matterhorn Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Autodesk (“Merger Sub”), MaintainX Inc., a Delaware corporation (“MaintainX”), and Shareholder Representative Services LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, solely in its capacity as the securityholde…
Director — Stephen Milligan: Stephen Milligan retired from the Board with a successor nominated.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On February 26, 2026, Autodesk, Inc. (“Autodesk” or the “Company”) issued a press release reporting financial results for the fourth quarter and fiscal year ended January 31, 2026. The press release is furnished herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference. The exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or incorporated by reference in…
Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. On January 22, 2026, Autodesk, Inc. (“Autodesk” or the “Company”) announced a world-wide restructuring plan (the “Plan”) that marks the final phase of its sales and marketing optimization. Over the past few years, Autodesk has evolved its go-to-market strategy, streamlined customer engagement, and enhanced its sales channels to drive sustainable growth, while improving efficiency and driving operating margin growth. The implementation of this…