Reading ADEA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ADEA free→Reading ADEA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ADEA free→
NASDAQInformation TechnologySoftware - ApplicationSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, while management's recent track record has been steady. Earnings quality is neutral, and risk is elevated, with the sector backdrop providing a tailwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 82% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is rich. This valuation suggests that ADEA trades above peer multiples, and the longer horizon does not make that back through growth. If ADEA cuts guidance on the next call, that could be a meaningful negative. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 5 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $31.92. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $32 ADEA trades at 18× p/e — 1.8× the 10× p/e peer median, and above its own 10× history. The market is re-rating it beyond its own range; our $17 fair value is low-confidence here. Analysts: $35–$43. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 84% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about 10%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Flags: expensive valuation, weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating).
For similar setups historically (n=889): about 49% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 85% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated strong grew net income 73% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2777).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.31x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 62% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2831).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.35 → $0.31 (-13.1% / 30d). 0 raised, 3 cut, 4 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 100% of analysts rate Buy.
Divergence: fundamentals are strong but estimates are being cut. Worth reading the recent material events.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$217.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$465.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,481.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: The new CEO may change the company’s plans and actions. We need clear information.
Confirms one read:An announcement about the new CEO's plans and goals.
Confirms the other:No clear updates on the CEO change or ongoing confusion.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for ADEA yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
CEO — Paul E. Davis: Mr. Davis is stepping down to focus on his health and personal pursuits.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$35.00 – $43.00 (median $40.00) · 3 analysts · as of 2026-05-06
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus IT Consulting & Other Services.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
ADEA Adeia, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 37 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
IBM IBM | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 32 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
ACN Accenture | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 98 of 100 | full | elevated |
CTSH Cognizant | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 90 of 100 | fair | elevated |
APLD APPLIED DIGITAL CORPORATION | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 19 of 100 | expensive | high |
1 material management or governance event in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Information Technology names rated stable grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 62% for the rest of the cohort, n=797).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on increasing revenue growth through strategic initiatives.
Continue to maintain dividend payments to shareholders.
Focus on enhancing operating income through cost management and efficiency.
Why it matters: Keeping dividends is important. Missing a payment can lower investor trust.
Confirms:A press release that confirms dividend payments will continue.
Disproves:A press release announcing a suspension or cut to dividend payments.
Why it matters: This would signal a slowdown in revenue growth, which is a key priority for Adeia.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth reported below 5% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth reported above 5% year over year.
Why it matters: Maintaining the dividend is key for investor confidence. A missed payment could hurt sentiment.
Confirms:Announcement of a dividend payment greater than or equal to $0.05 per share.
Disproves:No news about dividend payments or a cut to the dividend.
Why it matters: The CEO change may impact the company's plans and how investors feel about Adeia.
Confirms one read:Good news about the leadership change that makes investors feel better about the future.
Confirms the other:Bad news or confusion about the leadership change.
of this report, including Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that Section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act.