Reading ACM? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ACM free→Reading ACM? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ACM free→
NYSEIndustrialsEngineering & ConstructionSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral. Earnings quality is fragile, and management is volatile. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Compared with sector peers, ACM is above typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 61% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, value-trap risk because recent financials are weak or earnings quality is fragile. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $70.12. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $70 ACM trades at 13× p/e, below its 34× p/e peer median. Our $185 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $90–$116. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 62% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 3%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 64% for the rest of the cohort, n=4882).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.10x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Industrials names rated fragile grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=3333).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.56 → $1.54 (-1.4% / 30d). 3 raised, 4 cut, 9 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 85% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 25.9% above current price.
0 positive, 1 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$135.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$268.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $4,861.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Confidence changed from 'high' to 'medium'.
Signal changed from 'mild_favorable' to 'favorable'.
Confidence changed to medium. The signal changed to favorable.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: This will show if AECOM is improving its revenue growth. It is key for future plans.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth exceeds 6% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth falls below 3% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Advances: Increase revenue growth
Defense wins could significantly boost revenue growth.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On June 10, 2026, AECOM entered into that certain Credit Agreement (the “ Revolving Credit Agreement ”), by and among AECOM, as borrower, certain domestic subsidiaries of AECOM from time to time party thereto, as designated borrowers (together with AECOM, the “ Borrowers ”), the lenders from time to time party thereto (the “ Lenders ”) and Bank of America, N.A. (the “ Administrative Agent ”) as administrative agent and swing line lender. The Revolvi…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$90.00 – $116.00 (median $105.00) · 6 analysts · as of 2026-05-19
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Construction & Engineering.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
ACM AECOM | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 98 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
PWR Quanta Services | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 50 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
FIX Comfort Systems USA | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 74 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
EME Emcor | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 89 of 100 | full | moderate |
MTZ MasTec | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 47 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
3 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Industrials names rated volatile grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 59% for the rest of the cohort, n=840).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLI
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on increasing revenue growth through strategic initiatives and market expansion.
Focus on enhancing operating income through operational efficiencies and strategic investments.
Aim to increase net income through strategic initiatives and operational efficiencies.
Why it matters: Dividends show how well a company is doing. A steady or rising dividend can help investors feel good.
Confirms:The dividend remains at $0.31 per share or increases.
Disproves:The dividend is cut or suspended.
Why it matters: If net income grows over 10%, it shows AECOM's cost management is working. This could improve investor sentiment.
Confirms:Net income growth reported above 10% year over year for Q3.
Disproves:Net income growth reported below 10% year over year for Q3.
Why it matters: Improving operating income shows AECOM is managing costs well. This supports growth plans.
Confirms:Operating income increases by more than 5% year over year.
Disproves:Operating income decreases or grows less than 2% year over year.
Why it matters: If sector revenue growth speeds up, it may help AECOM's performance. This could signal a better market environment.
Confirms one read:Sector revenue growth reported above 10% year over year.
Confirms the other:Sector revenue growth reported below 5% year over year.
Why it matters: If operating income stays stable, AECOM may be managing costs better. This can help make more money.
Confirms:Operating income was above $250M for Q3.
Disproves:Operating income was below $250M for Q3.
Advances: Increase revenue growth
Defense wins could significantly boost revenue growth.
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant . The information set forth in
Other Events. On June 3, 2026, AECOM announced that its Board of Directors has declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.31 per share as part of the Company’s ongoing quarterly dividend program. The dividend is payable on July 17, 2026 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on July 1, 2026. The declaration and payment of future dividends are subject to the sole discretion of the Board of Directors. The press release announcing the declaration of a cash dividend is attached heret…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 11, 2026, AECOM issued a press release announcing its financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. A copy of the press release is attached to this report as Exhibit 99.1. Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. AECOM reports it…