Reading ACAD? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ACAD free→Reading ACAD? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ACAD free→
NASDAQHealth CareBiotechnologySnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but earnings quality is fragile, indicating that reported profits may not be well-supported by cash flow. Management's recent track record has been neutral, and the company has a capital-unfriendly stance. The sector backdrop is a headwind, and compared with sector peers, ACAD is below typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 112% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is rich, as it trades above peer multiples, and the longer horizon does not make that back through growth. This analysis is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 5 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $21.09. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $21 the market pays 29× p/e — above the 13× p/e peer median but in line with its own 27× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $9.94 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with low confidence. Analysts: $29–$35. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 112% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about 22%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Flags: expensive valuation, weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating).
For similar setups historically (n=889): about 49% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 85% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Health Care names rated strong grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 52% for the rest of the cohort, n=2344).
Over the trailing year it converted 0.33x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Health Care names rated fragile grew net income 40% of the time over the next year (vs 56% for the rest of the cohort, n=1703).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.11 → $0.04 (-66.2% / 30d). 1 raised, 5 cut, 11 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 76% of analysts rate Buy.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
Divergence: fundamentals are strong but estimates are being cut. Worth reading the recent material events.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$153.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$331.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,758.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: The outcome could affect the company's reputation and finances. It is important to watch.
Confirms:The company will give a good update or fix on the lawsuit in the coming months.
Disproves:The company shares bad news or problems related to the lawsuit.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for ACAD yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
have been furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to liability under that section nor shall they be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing regardless of any general incorporation language.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$29.00 – $35.00 (median $33.00) · 3 analysts · as of 2026-03-02
Looks more expensive than peers.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Pharmaceuticals.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
ACAD Acadia Pharmaceuticals | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 18 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
LLY Lilly (Eli) | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 85 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 69 of 100 | expensive | low |
MRK Merck & Co. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 62 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
PFE Pfizer | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 62 of 100 | fair | low |
3 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Health Care names rated neutral grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 50% for the rest of the cohort, n=842).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLV
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Management continues to reaffirm its full year revenue guidance of $1.22 to $1.28 billion.
Management aims to control SG&A expenses within the range of $660 to $700 million for 2026.
Why it matters: A new leader in R&D could change the direction of product development. This could impact future drug approvals.
Confirms:A new Head of Research and Development has been announced. They have strong industry experience.
Disproves:No announcement of a new R&D leader within three months.
Why it matters: Reaffirming guidance shows confidence in revenue growth. It can boost investor trust.
Confirms:Management says full year revenue guidance will not change in the next earnings call.
Disproves:Management lowers full year revenue guidance during the next earnings call.
Why it matters: The court case outcome could affect the company's money and reputation.
Confirms:The court case ends with a good settlement or dismissal.
Disproves:The court case ends with a ruling against the company or large financial penalties.
Why it matters: Higher expenses could hurt profits. Keeping costs in check is crucial for growth.
Confirms:SG&A expenses reported above the targeted range in the next earnings report.
Disproves:SG&A expenses reported within or below the targeted range in the next earnings report.
Head of Research and Development — Elizabeth H.Z. Thompson, Ph.D.: Dr. Thompson is retiring for personal reasons but will remain as a consultant.
Regulation FD Disclosure. On April 30, 2026, the Company issued a press release announcing the planned retirement of Dr. Thompson. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K. As provided in General Instruction B.2 of Form 8-K, the information in this Item 7.01, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto, shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of, or otherwise subject to the liabilities under, Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as ame…
Annual board election with no specific departures or promotions mentioned.