Reading ABT? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ABT free→Reading ABT? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ABT free→
NYSEHealth CareMedical DevicesSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes. Earnings quality is neutral, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, which may pose challenges. Peer multiples imply a price about 24% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair. Key factors to watch include any potential cuts to guidance and the performance of sector bellwethers, as these could significantly influence ABT's outlook.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $88.18. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $88 ABT trades at 17× p/e, below its 23× p/e peer median. Our $123 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Analysts: $92–$158. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 28% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 12%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Health Care names rated strong grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 52% for the rest of the cohort, n=2344).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.51x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Health Care names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 50% for the rest of the cohort, n=2269).
Not enough signal yet.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, the broad stock market, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
10 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Health Care names rated volatile grew net income 43% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=600).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.28 → $1.28 (-0.0% / 30d). 0 raised, 2 cut, 22 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 75% of analysts rate Buy.
Divergence: fundamentals are strong but estimates are being cut. Worth reading the recent material events.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$93.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$218.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,898.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Guidance credibility rose by 25.0 points (from 75.0 to 100.0).
Management rose by 9.9 points (from 78.3 to 88.2).
Valuation label changed from 'fair' to 'inexpensive'.
Guidance credibility rose. Management also rose. Both changes indicate stronger confidence in the company.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Lower EPS shows problems in growing after the Exact Sciences purchase.
Confirms:Q2 2026 adjusted diluted EPS was below $1.25.
Disproves:Q2 2026 adjusted diluted EPS was above $1.31.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for ABT yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On April 16, 2026, Abbott Laboratories announced its results of operations for the first quarter 2026. Furnished as Exhibit 99.1, and incorporated herein by reference, is the news release issued by Abbott announcing those results. In that news release, Abbott uses various non-GAAP financial measures including, among others, net earnings excluding specified items. These non-GAAP financial measures adjust for factors that are unusual or unpredictabl…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$92.00 – $158.00 (median $120.00) · 7 analysts · as of 2026-04-22
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Health Care Equipment.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
ABT Abbott Laboratories | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 93 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
ISRG Intuitive Surgical | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 94 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
SYK Stryker Corporation | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 67 of 100 | fair | moderate |
MDT Medtronic | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 89 of 100 | fair | moderate |
BSX Boston Scientific | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 96 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLV
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 8 guided quarters · 22.6% avg surprise
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on achieving organic sales growth of 6.5% to 7.5% for the full year 2026.
Focus on achieving EPS growth while managing the dilution impact from the Exact Sciences acquisition.
Focus on integrating Exact Sciences to realize synergies and strengthen the oncology diagnostics market position.
Focus on achieving at least $100 million in annual pre-tax synergies by 2028 from the Exact Sciences acquisition.
Why it matters: Falling sales growth shows weaker demand in key markets after the acquisition.
Confirms:Q2 2026 comparable sales growth was below 6.5%.
Disproves:Q2 2026 comparable sales growth was above 7.5%.
Why it matters: Getting synergies is key. It helps cut losses from the purchase and boosts growth.
Confirms:Management says they achieved at least $100 million in synergies from the deal.
Disproves:Management says synergies are not happening like they thought.
Why it matters: The results of these lawsuits could affect Abbott's reputation and financial health.
Confirms:Court rulings support Abbott, lowering the risk from lawsuits.
Disproves:Court rulings or settlements raise liability for Abbott.
Other Events. As previously disclosed in Abbott’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2025, six shareholder derivative lawsuits have been pending in a consolidated proceeding, In re Abbott Laboratories Infant Formula Shareholder Derivative Litigation , before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against certain of Abbott’s current and former directors and officers. On April 10, 2026, in connection with tha…
Other Events. On March 23, 2026, Abbott Laboratories, an Illinois corporation (“Abbott”), completed the acquisition of Exact Sciences Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Exact Sciences”), pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 19, 2025 (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among Abbott, Exact Sciences and Badger Merger Sub I, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Abbott (“Merger Sub”). Pursuant to the terms of, and subject to the condit…
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement On March 9, 2026, Abbott Laboratories (“Abbott”) completed the public offering and issuance of $20,000,000,000 aggregate principal amount of senior notes, consisting of $1,000,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its Floating Rate Notes due 2029 (the “Floating Rate Notes”), $2,250,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its 3.700% Notes due 2029 (the “2029 Notes”), $2,500,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its 4.000% Notes due 2031 (the “2031 Notes…
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant The information included in